Never asserted anything about a lie. The question was "why rile up the conspiracy crowd" and "what gain would that give them".. which I answered pretty clearly.
But assuming it is a lie, for the sake of argument, it's impossible to disprove that it's Q so there is zero risk.
There is so much wrong with that answer; I don't know where to begin. Why would the CEO of "TRUTH Social" hype his platform with a LIE..?
Never asserted anything about a lie. The question was "why rile up the conspiracy crowd" and "what gain would that give them".. which I answered pretty clearly.
But assuming it is a lie, for the sake of argument, it's impossible to disprove that it's Q so there is zero risk.
Told ya so ;)