I'd say about two-thirds full, which was more than me & my gf were expecting given that the promotional stuff all said it released on the 4th. Also had a conversation about epstein with a guy and his wife when it was over lol.
Also surprised it was only rated PG-13 for "violence, sex trafficking, smoking throughout" etc...
Part 1:
https://altcensored.com/watch?v=kxOE7nSaOGY
Part 2:
https://altcensored.com/watch?v=H8TimC5e1Ww
Part 3:
https://altcensored.com/watch?v=D-_Yr_4Jtgk
Originally uploaded to YouTube but the channel was deleted in August 2022.
Expand your thinking. He notified a whole generation of the hypocrisy of the elites. He said he never wanted a private jet before the lovkdowns but it was the only way to get around the lock downs and since he had the money he was able to.
Unlike others he actually just straight up told the public it was to get around the lock downs, which he didn't even support.
It's the top/first video on Rumble.com
But here is a direct link.
https://rumble.com/v1hafpj-emergency-meeting-the-matrix-attacks..html
This plan has been a while in the making, fun to see where it goes... here is my other post on Tate for context.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTfnw05V/andrew-tate-is-a-cruisemissile-t/
Andrew Tate is part of the plan as far as I can tell.
He comes onto the scene, he's loud, he is a playboy, but he espouses reading the Bible, gaining wealth, having children and having a good life with your wife/husband, etc...
Now for context there is a big gap between what users see on YouTube compared to what you would see on Rumble. People who are awake probably use both plus other sites, people who are asleep only use the mainstream platform and through bots, algorithmic-demotion and suppression (plus banning or shadowbanning links to alt-media, especially when it would've shown to a left-leaning individual).
Now Andrew Tate gets canceled on all MSM sites in an identical attack to Alex Jones' cancelation, but they misjudged Tate's influence on younger generations. They got worried when Tate reached #1 most-Googled man in the world for that time a couple days ago.
They ban him and he utilizes his younger tech-savvy audience to herd them towards Rumble for a very-powerful speech (it's the one in my image) & most of those viewers aren't Rumble natives... now that video ends and those 500k+ tech-savvy people might likely be like "what else am I being lied to about, there are some interesting looking recommended videos beneath this one, I might stay here a while.
Then like a flood, this wave of tech-savvy people who've never been algorithmically-suppressed or shadowbanned is posting redpills to the MSM sights at a rate that doesn't allow for any method of suppression. I think Tate is the fission-bomb that fuses the parallel right-wing/independent parts of the internet with the establishment's digital-territory.
JUST WATCH THE VIDEO IN MY PIC COMPLETELY THROUGH!
Notice the "Q" that flashes behind him at that moment in the video? It is from a short repeating clip that they play several times throughout, I was wondering why it was being played so much and then I noticed the Q that flashes briefly.
Furthermore he raises a lot of beef with left-wing and apolitical mainstream YouTubers that jumped on the band-waggon of "yay, Tate is banned!" which will force them to respond on YouTube drawing more attention to Tate who will direct more people to Rumble.
Is this the trigger for mass-awakening?
Here is the FOIA'ed incident-report in-case you're interested as well :)
Yeah, but there was a FOIA submitted on the incident at a later date. The sub was docked at Pearl Harbor for some sort of maintenance at the time of the incident.
Here is the pdf that was released in-response to the FOIA:
All good dude! Actually mid-20's here but I don't mind giving a quick rundown.
Essentially there are two stories:
- the recent shootout with the FBI in Cincinnati.
- an older story from a couple years back where a guard on a US nuclear-sub docked in Hawaii shot two contractors while on guard-duty. Official story was that he had a psychotic-break.
What do they have in common? The navy guard that shot those contractors and the guy who had the shootout with the FBI were:
- both in the navy
- both the same rank
- both stationed on the same type of vessel
The navy guy from the contractor shooting also had a really unusual service-history (who leaves their position in the navy to join the Florida National Guard to join in the occupation of Iraq, only then to go back to the navy)? There are also 9min of security footage missing from the contractor shooting that was disregarded with a single sentence in the official report of the incident.
Not saying both stories are definitely related but there is what I mentioned above and a fair bit more inconsistencies and there is enough commonalities between the two stories that they just don't pass the sniff-test.
I don't have a logical explanation for them, but they just don't add up in any satisfactory way.
Further excerpts from what the OP stated in this thread:
-
"that class of submarine also happens to be the only type in service with the us navy that has a diving trunk capable of deploying and retrieving seal teams while remaining submerged. needless to say they dont just let anyone serve on these things. nukes (as in navy nuclear reactor technicians) even see it as an elite assignment, despite the trust already placed in them and the numerous psychological screenings and background checks they endure, and most are relegated to the surface fleet and stuck on aircraft carriers."
-
"the basic point is that in the course of their duties, however numerous or divergent, they most likely accessed the same areas of the ship in a similar capacity and therefore were exposed to similar phenomenon, stimulus, information, sights, experiences or which ever term you want to apply. coincidentally, both of these people become involved in shootings with civilian federal employees where they die from an insinuated suicide over a relatively short span of time. notwithstanding my lack of acute clarification over the scope of their duties on board a ship, does this not seem to you somewhat anomalous?"
-
"i dont have all of the answers. i only have information that leads me to believe a certain situation is more likely than another. why it was in dry dock to begin with, we will most likely never know, but it is obvious that if it was swarming with contractors at the time, as you say, then it makes it all the more peculiar why this small group for some reason stood out to him or moved him to actually fire his weapon. in the investigation done by the navy it doesnt seem to identify that any witnesses were present aside from the petty officer of the deck (if there were any others) and doesnt state whether or not he gave them commands before firing on them. re-reading it it does say explicitly that the dry dock was at pearl harbor and not san diego. the conclusion is contradictory in that it states he was unfit for duty and most likely psychotic, yet was serving on what could be considered one of the most sensitive platforms in any military branch. furthermore he was screened and approved for armed patrols in this capacity. during this time he was never once reported to counterintelligence or any authority through any insider threat reporting procedure. this conclusion is of course drawn posthumously."
Link to thread: https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/391662317
Really? I honestly didn't even have a clue lol! I'm guessing down where the flooding was in the Southeast? I'm more central and quite a bit farther north, but that's the only plausible explanation I've yet to see.
BTW this was the model of drone.
Almost definitely was this one or some variants of it.
Not too familiar with the specifics of UAVs personally, but I'll look over a few different types and see what matches best.
It had a backwards-facing tail-rotor, (I think) two tail-fins connected at the top, metallic/grey colored. I'll be back after looking up a few different types.
The Prosecution AND the Defense is arguing in-unison (in a trial that will be televised) that Richard Allen was framed by a network of Odinite Cultists embedded in various levels of law-enforcement (ALL NAMED) including officers at the local and state levels, within the Department of Corrections, as well as at-least one infiltrator in the FBI (again NAMED) with evidence of them manipulating the case and specific evidence manipulated to frame Richard Allen.
As well as crime-scene evidence, photo/video evidence, that the crime-scene investigators withheld evidence of Odinite/Pagan occultism at the scene of the crime including but not limited to easily-identifiable Pagan runes composed of sticks left on the bodies of at-least one of the girls and a rune drawn in the blood of one of the girls placed up on a tree overlooking the kill-site.