Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

306
Buckle up, we may have a second invasion coming… (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 4 years ago by purkiss80 4 years ago by purkiss80 +306 / -0
45 comments download share
45 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– redtoe-skipper 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Buckle up.

Who made the assumption?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– purkiss80 [S] 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Don't deflect...Your assumption was also a condescending comment aimed at us "guys"..."you lack knowledge and react to dog-whistles"... Buckle up is my opinion...So, I'm assuming Your comment about us guys "lacking knowledge" is your opinion then?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– redtoe-skipper 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Of course it was condescending. I freely admit it. And I will do you one better. You deserve it.

IF (and that is no typo) I were to go with your explanation that " buckle up" reflects your opinion, then you should have written: I am buckling up. Or, who is buckling up with me.

But no, you wrote the popi: Buckle up. A command, because you need all of us ready for an engagement. ... Yes, sir!

What follows is: may have a second invasion....

That is a call to emotion, not knowledge. It was meant to elicit an emotional response. It was meant to clickbait.

Because the situation of" MAY HAVE an invasion has been going on for quite some time. Actually, since the nationalists fled to Formosa in '49.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiang_Kai-shek

It is always funny when wiki is telling the truth: nationality: Republic of China. Note, not Chinese. but Republic of China. indicating it is a different nationality, a sovereign State. (hahahaha, the fuckers)

It would have been something, had you discussed the likelihood of several logistical issues connected to an invasion of the Republic of China. AND, also how easy it is to invade the Republic of China .... At least a cursory glance on a map would reveal the dozens of Islands right under the CCP' s nose.

Not to mention the daily invasion of aircraft of CCP origin.

Hence: lack of knowledge and dog whistle.

As I said: you deserved it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– purkiss80 [S] 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Like I said...Condescending...And after your little rant, add sanctimonious and arrogant for someone who knows jack shit about any of us...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– redtoe-skipper 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Ah .... stating the obvious, so we are in agreement. I am condescending towards what you wrote, indeed.

Your defense, if one might call it that, will surely appeal to the less salty. Of course, you have to try to project power by trying to diminish me. If what I wrote is a rant to you .... oh boy ... don' t you challenge me to rant, you will run for your snowflake - safe-space. I suspect you actually do not mean to make this impression, but you do so for being butt-hurt on the call-out. But all you succeed to do is projection.

Might I suggest you take a portion of your own medicine? No deflection?

Why? There is only opinion in your statements, and no fact or even supporting argument. I would remind you, you started using the word condescending, sanctimonious en arrogant. I did not. I used something else. Lack of knowledge, which I proved, dog whistle. Which I also proved.

To give you some closure on the words you so strategically used:

con = with
de = no (no now-space authorization due to movement)
scend = climbing
ing = objectivation of a verb = contract.

sanctimonious.
sanctimoni being devout, pi. ous = full off; making a verb into an object.

arrogant.
ar = ad = movement = coloration = not original = no.
roga = rogare
ant - objectivation of a verb. = contract.

There are several ways in which I could approach your use of language.

First, your opinion, is just that. And you are free to hold such. Be happy with it. Second, you have no idea what you are saying.

Condescending is in babbel-talk not a word of a negative persuasion, because it allows for human frailty. You are not suggesting you are without frailty, are you? in essence, to be condescending actually is a good thing, instead of a negative. So, at best, you just used the word totally inappropriately.

Sanctimonious. Really. Where is the irony in what you wrote? O ... I see. By the appeal to the word itself! Of course!

arrogant in babbel-talk means movement towards questions asked. Ah .... however,

On second glance your whole ... eh ... exercise in using Latin-words:

with no climbing contract devout full off no questions contract.

Wow. I am .... as it is called in French: emballé, ready to ship.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 5 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy