I find it extraordinary that such thinking exists after all the tests during the late 40s into the 50s and early 60s. They were the cause of at least a quarter million deaths from drinking dairy products laden with nuke particles from fallout that drifted east into dairy country.
Add the oneupmanship of the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba a 50 megaton monster and you have millions of acres of contaminated land and add to that Chernobyl and Fukushima and you have a more perfect poisoning of the world than expected..
Seriously where did this "nukes don't exist" come from? Is it this year's version of the invasion of flat Earthers and moon hoaxers we had last year around this time?
With respect, I think your numbers are unjustifiably high. And difficult to verify. Fukushima, for example, is a nothing, despite all the anxiety hype. Chernobyl was a nasty piece of work, but even that has been overblown.
OK then, just where ARE the 3 corium that escaped their containment 11 years ago?? Enough there to kill the Pacific, if it hasn't already with 500 tons of river water flowing over the corium every single day for the last 11 years. All this is difficult to verify because the japs are lying about everything and putting pretty barriers up to hide reality of the destroyed reactors. We already know the life span of a worker to fall into the pit is less than a minute. Until you do real digging to prove me wrong, my 5-6 years of digging says it IS a huge deal.
You are borderline coherent. There are no "corium" (there are reactor cores). They were contained, but melted down. The heat caused chemical reactions between the fuel cladding (e.g., zirconium) and the coolant water, resulting in hydrogen explosions and some release of radioactive gases (e.g., xenon), some of which got into the ocean. The whole story is ably summarized in this entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster_casualties
If you haven't been able to disprove what the Japanese are saying, how can you know they are lying? Your remark about lifespan is ridiculous. Only one man died who worked on the recovery, and it was from lung cancer that was imputed to radiation exposure. This digging is enough to show that your 5-6 years of digging was worthless.
I find it extraordinary that such thinking exists after all the tests during the late 40s into the 50s and early 60s. They were the cause of at least a quarter million deaths from drinking dairy products laden with nuke particles from fallout that drifted east into dairy country.
Add the oneupmanship of the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba a 50 megaton monster and you have millions of acres of contaminated land and add to that Chernobyl and Fukushima and you have a more perfect poisoning of the world than expected..
Seriously where did this "nukes don't exist" come from? Is it this year's version of the invasion of flat Earthers and moon hoaxers we had last year around this time?
Aberrations come and go, but Truth never changes even when suppressed..
With respect, I think your numbers are unjustifiably high. And difficult to verify. Fukushima, for example, is a nothing, despite all the anxiety hype. Chernobyl was a nasty piece of work, but even that has been overblown.
OK then, just where ARE the 3 corium that escaped their containment 11 years ago?? Enough there to kill the Pacific, if it hasn't already with 500 tons of river water flowing over the corium every single day for the last 11 years. All this is difficult to verify because the japs are lying about everything and putting pretty barriers up to hide reality of the destroyed reactors. We already know the life span of a worker to fall into the pit is less than a minute. Until you do real digging to prove me wrong, my 5-6 years of digging says it IS a huge deal.
You are borderline coherent. There are no "corium" (there are reactor cores). They were contained, but melted down. The heat caused chemical reactions between the fuel cladding (e.g., zirconium) and the coolant water, resulting in hydrogen explosions and some release of radioactive gases (e.g., xenon), some of which got into the ocean. The whole story is ably summarized in this entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster_casualties
If you haven't been able to disprove what the Japanese are saying, how can you know they are lying? Your remark about lifespan is ridiculous. Only one man died who worked on the recovery, and it was from lung cancer that was imputed to radiation exposure. This digging is enough to show that your 5-6 years of digging was worthless.
Thank you for your construction paper critique.. I will not address your personal criticisms of me vios con Dios, amiga.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=fukashima+radiation+leaks+%2B+2021&form=ANNTH1&refig=788235908cd146e288d5f6c8a0f790c8&sp=3&qs=SC&pq=fukushima&sk=PRES1LS2&sc=5-9&cvid=788235908cd146e288d5f6c8a0f790c8