I'm using it in the most general sense, which is, "what the world outside of Q thinks."
We can't have a debate until you define the term. You claimed that you were good at predicting how normies will react, but you did not define your idea of a normie.
Now you are saying that anyone who doesn't follow Q is a normie. So Trump-loving patriots who don't agree with transgender therapy are "normies" by your definition if they don't follow Q? (You do know the majority of Trump voters don't follow Q or even know much about it, don't you?)
You've basically said by your current position that majority of Trump supporters are normies.
I am asking what, in your opinion, is a "normie".
Do you think normies agree with transgender therapy and preferred gender pronouns? (Yes or no?)
Do you think normies agree with gay marriage?
Do you think normies are pro-vax?
Do you think normies are pro-mask?
I think you know very well the point I'm making. Just answer the questions above with yes or no. It's real simple.
I'm not really certain how to respond, because you're suggesting that "normies" are some labeled political class. If I say yes, yes, yes, and yes, I'm describing someone further left than no, yes, no, no.
Both people could hold beliefs that Q is nonsense, right? There are plenty of Trump supporters considered "normies" because they aren't on the Q Train.
This isn't my label I'm using. I'm using the label of you guys to describe the "other", those who aren't Q. Exactly how they would answer a Facebook political quiz isn't really important, as long as they aren't looking at things through the Q perspective.
I'm not really going to die on the hill of some offhand comment I made and I'm not sure exactly what it is you want to debate here.
I'm not really certain how to respond, because you're suggesting that "normies" are some labeled political class.
I only gave those questions do get an idea of what you define as a "normie" You keep trying to make it about what you claim others' think of a normie. Why are you unable to define a normie? If you can't define a normie, then you can't claim to understand how they think.
If I say yes, yes, yes, and yes, I'm describing someone further left than no, yes, no, no.
You are aware of the point I'm making. You claim "I know how normies think" but really you only know the group YOU define as a normie think. You know you can't claim to know how normies think when you won't even define what you think is "normal".
What is a "normal" person to you?
This isn't my label I'm using. I'm using the label of you guys to describe the "other", those who aren't Q.
No, you're not. You're using the label you slapped onto Q supporters when you generalized us. At least have the guts to recognize that.
Again, you keep hiding behind what you claim others think. You don't know what we think. How could you? You can't even define what you think. All your opinions are what you believe are other people's opinions.
How can anyone debate you when you don't make any actual definitions of your own? If I say you're wrong, you can just change your definition because you NEVER defined your own.
Exactly how they would answer a Facebook political quiz isn't really important, as long as they aren't looking at things through the Q perspective.
More evasion.
Put aside Q, and define a "normie".
Both people could hold beliefs that Q is nonsense, right?
I thought you claimed to know how normies think. Clearly you don't. Just because people don't understand or take an interest in something doesn't mean they'd regard it as nonsense. If that is your idea of what normies think, then I'd be very interested in you defining what a "normal" person is.
I'm not really going to die on the hill of some offhand comment I made and I'm not sure exactly what it is you want to debate here.
So you're gonna run away because you're scared to define it? You know once you define it you'll be stuck with YOUR definition. You know you can be debated and cornered on your logic.
Which means when you claimed to know what normies think, you did not mean "normies" or actually "normal" people.
Why don't you have an honest debate and define your terms first instead of hiding behind others?
Okay, look at my post history. I’ve been talking all day about a bunch of different things and I’ll blame any obtuseness on me multitasking too many conversations. I apologize I wasn’t giving you the debate you wanted, I’ve just been trying to find a polite stopping point for the night without making anyone feel ghosted. I wasn’t aware that particular comment was going to be worth discussing in such detail, but we can if you think it’s worth exploring.
I am happy to take a closer look at this again if you’d like, truly. I am just running out of time I don’t have scheduled for stuff at the moment. Can I take a brief rain check here?
I'm using it in the most general sense, which is, "what the world outside of Q thinks." Which is typically the way it's used around here.
If I knew what point you were trying to make, I may be able to give you an answer more conducive to whatever conversation we're having right now.
We can't have a debate until you define the term. You claimed that you were good at predicting how normies will react, but you did not define your idea of a normie.
Now you are saying that anyone who doesn't follow Q is a normie. So Trump-loving patriots who don't agree with transgender therapy are "normies" by your definition if they don't follow Q? (You do know the majority of Trump voters don't follow Q or even know much about it, don't you?)
You've basically said by your current position that majority of Trump supporters are normies.
I am asking what, in your opinion, is a "normie".
Do you think normies agree with transgender therapy and preferred gender pronouns? (Yes or no?)
Do you think normies agree with gay marriage?
Do you think normies are pro-vax?
Do you think normies are pro-mask?
I think you know very well the point I'm making. Just answer the questions above with yes or no. It's real simple.
I'm not really certain how to respond, because you're suggesting that "normies" are some labeled political class. If I say yes, yes, yes, and yes, I'm describing someone further left than no, yes, no, no.
Both people could hold beliefs that Q is nonsense, right? There are plenty of Trump supporters considered "normies" because they aren't on the Q Train.
This isn't my label I'm using. I'm using the label of you guys to describe the "other", those who aren't Q. Exactly how they would answer a Facebook political quiz isn't really important, as long as they aren't looking at things through the Q perspective.
I'm not really going to die on the hill of some offhand comment I made and I'm not sure exactly what it is you want to debate here.
I only gave those questions do get an idea of what you define as a "normie" You keep trying to make it about what you claim others' think of a normie. Why are you unable to define a normie? If you can't define a normie, then you can't claim to understand how they think.
You are aware of the point I'm making. You claim "I know how normies think" but really you only know the group YOU define as a normie think. You know you can't claim to know how normies think when you won't even define what you think is "normal".
What is a "normal" person to you?
No, you're not. You're using the label you slapped onto Q supporters when you generalized us. At least have the guts to recognize that.
Again, you keep hiding behind what you claim others think. You don't know what we think. How could you? You can't even define what you think. All your opinions are what you believe are other people's opinions.
How can anyone debate you when you don't make any actual definitions of your own? If I say you're wrong, you can just change your definition because you NEVER defined your own.
More evasion.
Put aside Q, and define a "normie".
I thought you claimed to know how normies think. Clearly you don't. Just because people don't understand or take an interest in something doesn't mean they'd regard it as nonsense. If that is your idea of what normies think, then I'd be very interested in you defining what a "normal" person is.
So you're gonna run away because you're scared to define it? You know once you define it you'll be stuck with YOUR definition. You know you can be debated and cornered on your logic.
Which means when you claimed to know what normies think, you did not mean "normies" or actually "normal" people.
Why don't you have an honest debate and define your terms first instead of hiding behind others?
Okay, look at my post history. I’ve been talking all day about a bunch of different things and I’ll blame any obtuseness on me multitasking too many conversations. I apologize I wasn’t giving you the debate you wanted, I’ve just been trying to find a polite stopping point for the night without making anyone feel ghosted. I wasn’t aware that particular comment was going to be worth discussing in such detail, but we can if you think it’s worth exploring.
I am happy to take a closer look at this again if you’d like, truly. I am just running out of time I don’t have scheduled for stuff at the moment. Can I take a brief rain check here?