Pfizer vaccine data. Of particular interest is page 30: full pages of known adverse effects…
(twitter.com)
💉VACCINE DATA RELEASE 💉
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (209)
sorted by:
Lol, wtf do database keys have to do with this that you're so fixated on this? How does reference GUIDs, or database indexes have to do with any of the data the database actually contains? Database keys are nothing more than internal reference points between data objects within the database. Any sort of analysis of data held in a database wouldn't ever be affected by database keys.
Wait.
I'm sorry, your mystery strategy that was too complicated for me to even fathom was just correlating publicly accessible data of two known datasets?
This is the skill set that is beyond anyone but truth-seeking autists and the Cabal scientists who are bribed not to do this?
Are you assuming that this kind of analysis isn't done as part of a daily Excel report by some bored intern at every major medical research facility on the planet?
That nobody already using VAERS data ever considered perhaps drawing from a secondary data source looking at the same thing? That's an intelligence relegated only to your level of expertise?
I'm just not exactly certain how you think "proof" attained by that means could possibly be covered up. It definitely does not take your claimed level of expertise to conceptualize or execute that analysis.
The reason it's not freaking anyone out could be because it doesn't represent what you think it does, and therefore does not display the level of terrifying catastrophe you believe is occurring.
Or maybe not. Maybe you are just so much smarter than everyone else that your brain allowed you to stumble upon such an unnervingly-obvious solution as correlating one data set to a second similar data set and to find mind-blowing "proof" through this somehow untried statistical method to reveal a truth unattainable by literally anyone else.
I just have a hard time rectifying your "I am so much smarter than everyone, I know more than you, don't even question my level of understanding of everything" attitude with your claims to be a truth-seeker and adherent of Q's socratic philosophies. You cannot get smarter if you do not believe that it's possible to be wrong about things that matter to you.
I am here because I understand that. You should be here for the same reason.
Perhaps. Luckily, you're also aware as a data scientist that if COVID presents literally any non-zero threat, you now have to measure that against the threat of the vaccine, which requires the numbers I'm asking for. The only way you can dismiss it completely is if you can prove the virus either does not exist or has absolutely no deleterious effects.
I don't know how old you are, but you are surely old enough to have cringey memories of when you were younger. Make this whole thing you do here one of those memories. You can stop with the false bravado and start acting like the academically-oriented adult you claim to be.