on the slowest setting, and pausing it every frame, I see the plane in the building then the bulge of the side explosion. Looks ok to me. Also it would be hard to coordinate a specific explosion on the same area the plane comes in on. The pilot would have to get the altitude just right as he wasn't flying level. A full jet of fuel exploding has to go somewhere and that plane was probably towards the middle of the building when the explosion occurred. EDIT: I think the dancing israelis and the pics of mossad with all the detonators in boxes are more damning.
The only fuel in that aircraft was in the wings. That fuel can be seen exploding on the nearer side. An aluminum plane cannot "penetrate" steel and concrete, according to the engineers that analyzed the evidence, and design of the buildings. And even if it could, there is no fuel up in the nose. I think we see two separate fuel loads here. The one that is deeper in the building has significantly more of a fireball than the wing-fueled fireball. That doesn't make any sense. The location of the plane's fuel is the key here, IMHO.
Its too bad we don't have an extra few floors of a WTC tower out in the desert somewhere and an old 737 full of fuel. I'd like to replicate this. Like at what speed would it take for aluminum framed wings to shear off steel I beams. I dunno.
on the slowest setting, and pausing it every frame, I see the plane in the building then the bulge of the side explosion. Looks ok to me. Also it would be hard to coordinate a specific explosion on the same area the plane comes in on. The pilot would have to get the altitude just right as he wasn't flying level. A full jet of fuel exploding has to go somewhere and that plane was probably towards the middle of the building when the explosion occurred. EDIT: I think the dancing israelis and the pics of mossad with all the detonators in boxes are more damning.
The only fuel in that aircraft was in the wings. That fuel can be seen exploding on the nearer side. An aluminum plane cannot "penetrate" steel and concrete, according to the engineers that analyzed the evidence, and design of the buildings. And even if it could, there is no fuel up in the nose. I think we see two separate fuel loads here. The one that is deeper in the building has significantly more of a fireball than the wing-fueled fireball. That doesn't make any sense. The location of the plane's fuel is the key here, IMHO.
Its too bad we don't have an extra few floors of a WTC tower out in the desert somewhere and an old 737 full of fuel. I'd like to replicate this. Like at what speed would it take for aluminum framed wings to shear off steel I beams. I dunno.
The only thing found was the terrorists visa. (Visa courtesy of John Brennan I hear.)