That would be a pretty poor way to do a micro dot since the enzyme itself will rapidly break down and there's no evidence that your body would continue to produce it for very long after the vaccine. There's much more effective ways to permanently embed a marker into a person's tissues, like a small sample of a low grade atomic isotope. They could detect it under the skin and likely even tell when it was injected based on the decay rates.
There's another reply here that describes it better than I can, but basically they can use the presence of luciferase to measure how well the vaccine components are being integrated, or as markers for the cells that have been trained, or whatever. Like it's good for tracking the treatments once in the body, like a barium milkshake for an MRI.
That would be a pretty poor way to do a micro dot since the enzyme itself will rapidly break down and there's no evidence that your body would continue to produce it for very long after the vaccine. There's much more effective ways to permanently embed a marker into a person's tissues, like a small sample of a low grade atomic isotope. They could detect it under the skin and likely even tell when it was injected based on the decay rates.
Luciferase is a 150-year-old nothingburger.
I still dont get why they want to test mRNA encoding of Luciferase instructions so that the body can produce it.
There's another reply here that describes it better than I can, but basically they can use the presence of luciferase to measure how well the vaccine components are being integrated, or as markers for the cells that have been trained, or whatever. Like it's good for tracking the treatments once in the body, like a barium milkshake for an MRI.