LeeChild has been going through the recent 9/11 "plane" thread calling anyone and everyone who claims the plane footage is fake a glowtard, shill, etc. He says he was "boots on the ground" (interesting term, military?) that day and that no one who was there that day would possibly say there were no planes in NYC that day.
Here are my questions for him:
-
You said in that thread that you are sure they weren't commercial flights, but military planes. Would you please explain how the horned owl Lt. Cononel knew immediately as soon as the plane hit that it was a United flight? I thought it wasn't a commercial plane, Lee. How could he know it was a United flight the moment 9/11 happened, and yet you know it wasn't a commercial flight.** Please explain. **
-
You say no eyewitnesses in NYC that day would say there were no planes, and shamed anyone who tried to say there weren't. Would you please explain why these eyewitnesses reiterated multiple times to the MSM FOX reporter that there absolutely wasn't a plane, it was a bomb, only to have the FOX reporter say "we saw it on tell-a-vision". This is the same FOX news that had the harley davidson guy ready and waiting to tell America that the towers collapsed "mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense". Please explain why these eyewitnesses reported no plane, although you said there would be zero eyewitnesses who would say such a thing.
https://odysee.com/@the911puzzle:9/911-FOX---an-eye-witness-says-it-was-a-bomb,-no-plane:b
How about this OTHER witness? "no a bomb, I saw it, no plane"
https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/911-Amateur-Camcorder-Footage--A-Bomb:4
Would you like to explain where the plane was in this footage? (3 angles)
https://odysee.com/@R.A.I.N.:0/9-11---Original-Tapes---No-planes!:f
- Could you explain why "9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera" shows conclusively that they fucked up a basic mask layer technique used in CGI, so that the nose of the United flight came out THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING. Even the news anchors said "it looks like the plane came right out the other side of the building". Please explain how a hollow aluminum nose could make it through 100 steel columns. This same documentary also shows conclusively how they used timed keyframes to match the explosions to the CGI, how the mask layers were fucked up by the FOX helicoptor, and how multiple camera angles didn't react to any high decibal "plane" noise, not even one flinch, until the explosion happened. For anyone who is skeptical, watch this entire thing, it is VITAL.
https://odysee.com/@Luis-Miguel-Barrera:c/9-11---Documentary---Part-7-8---The-Key-for-NO-PLANES:0
-
Could you please explain how an aluminum-winged United flight (again, you said it wasn't a commercial flight, but your horned owl faggot friend knew immediately it was, which one was it) so fragile that they have to write "no step" on the wing could possibly penetrate one foot thick steel beams?
-
Would you like to explain what happened to WTC 7 to us, Mr. LeeChild. How did it fall at the speed of gravity. Was it the boilers in the basement Mr. LeeChild, or was it a single column failure ala the NIST report. Which lie are you going with. Would you like to deny the 1. police officers ON VIDEO CAMERA saying they were about to blow it up 2. the BBC reporting it fell while it was still standing 3. the dozens of eye witnesses ON VIDEO CAMERA saying they heard sequential explosions, and saying they were told by firefighters to back up because they were going to detonate the building.
-
Would you like to explain these DOZENS of eyewitness reports of explosions in the lobby and other low-levels of the building including the basement. I thought it was planes that brought the towers down.
https://odysee.com/@SheepAlert:2/ZYTcJCPE9urp:f
https://odysee.com/@911truthnow:7/9-11-secondary-explosions-then:9
https://odysee.com/@the911puzzle:9/911-EyeWitnesses-To-WTC-Lobby-Explosion---NIST-FOIA:6
Barry Jennings "Bombs in WTC 7" interview
https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/9-11-whistleblowers-barry-jennings:a
it's true that plane/no plane is less important than who really did 9/11, but the plane narrative is important to the completely bs idea that it was only bin laden and 19 saudis.
Those buildings (3) were BOMBED to smithereens.
Absolutely correct. Remember that Silverstein was able to cash in on the insurance policy TWICE.
The military doesn’t use that term. At least it was never a common phrase while I was in. I do hear that phrasing all over the msm . Hmmm
We all know that this Lee Child person most likely will never answer these questions but the questions themselves are so very telling and full of information. Great job Patriot.
That's why I wrote it. There are some types of questions that really force people to think, especially about things they might want to dismiss.
Appreciate you.
CGI faggot OP is doing the shilliing
lol
You have to wonder - why were explosives in tower 7? If people were actually saying "they're gonna blow it," a person with an average number of brain cells to rub together would ask "blow it? Why are there explosives?"
I mean those videos are all still available and the building collapsed at freefall speed. There is no other explanation to anyone with a brain.
The reason is simple: WTC 7 housed NYC emergency response agency, multiple floors of CIA and FBI offices, Pentagon backup budget data, among numerous other key pieces that had to be disappeared. Likely a lot of the event was planned out of that building, so it had to come down.