Fascism was traditionally defined as an authoritarian government working hand-in-glove with corporations to achieve objectives. A centralized autocratic government, headed by a dictatorial leader, using severe economic and social regimentation and forcible suppression of opposition.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) was created to use the same fundamental associations of government and corporations. Only this time, it was the multinational corporations who organized to tell the government(s) what to do. The WEF was organized for multinational corporations to assemble and tell the various governments how to cooperate with them, in order to be rewarded by them. Corporatism was/is the outcome. The government is now doing what the multinationals tell them to do, and in return, the multinationals install the compliant politicians.
Fascism, the cooperation between government and corporations, is still the underlying premise; the World Economic Forum simply flipped the internal dynamic putting the corporations in charge of handing out the instructions.
What results is a slightly modified definition of fascism:
…A massive multinational corporate conglomerate, telling a centralized autocratic government leader what to do, and using severe economic and social regimentation as a control mechanism, combined with forcible suppression of opposition by both the corporations and government.
Thank you. See, they love to play games with words, calling it crony capitalism. No - it's fascism. Big government big corporation. Who controls what makes no difference. A capitalist doesn't argue for big corporation. He argues for small government. A socialist argues both for big government and small corporation, thinking little beyond what history has evidenced: the true root of all eviI is within power.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/02/oil-prices-pass-112-barrel-opec-holding-firm-here-comes-7-gasoline/>
Thank you. See, they love to play games with words, calling it crony capitalism. No - it's fascism. Big government big corporation. Who controls what makes no difference. A capitalist doesn't argue for big corporation. He argues for small government. A socialist argues both for big government and small corporation, thinking little beyond what history has evidenced: the true root of all eviI is within power.