Need a 2nd set of eyes…it looks like the ICAN Pfizer documents support the BMJ whistleblower’s claims that alerted people to Ventavia having issues with data integrity for their Phase III trials. Page 45/46 looks like a severe illness was reported but no notes were taken? 3.5k pgs of Ventavia docs
(www.icandecide.org)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
I'll take a gander, but we need more than just 2 people on this if it's 3.5K pages.
Yeah, agreed.
The conversations on the log entries about the person who died/after 45/46 seems like such a shitshow.
They entered follow up visit data for a visit date AFTER the reported date of death. And they have to nudge them multiple times to correct it.