What about J&J & Moderna? Are they releasing ingredients? Are the ingredients the same? I’m not understanding why one company is releasing ingredients and the other companies aren’t.
I think Moderna is the worst of a bad lot. J&J tried to avoid the mRNA vaccines, but that was quickly shutdown due to blood clot issues. I think they all had blood clot issues, but blaming it on J&J was convenient.
Not letting J&J off the hook. I suspect their turn is coming. Unless we find out that the DS was swapping vaccines to create a narrative - I would not rule that out.
I've got a theory that the blood clots are the result of the S-protein's action itself when it binds the ACE2 receptor. We haven't fully characterized that interaction. Given that so much of that occurs on the vascular endothelium, the inner-most cells lining your arteries and veins, it's logic that there's at least a possibility that something's happening that's making blood clots more likely.
What exactly? I don't know. I've heard thoughts that inflammation is part of the story, a bit like how atherosclerosis works. But we don't know.
What we do know is that microclots have been observed in people with active SARS-COV2 infection and in people who've been recently vaccinated. We know that people who are at little to no risk of clots are showing them.
It warranted more investigation than it got.
Blaming J&J's product was a bit of a farce. I'll admit I missed it early. What about J&J's product was the problem? The adenovirus? We had extensive data showing it did not cause such things. The inactive components, the buffers, etc? Again, we knew they didn't cause such things. It had to be the S-protein product. But no one asked questions. Just slap the warning on the box and go forward. So they did.
No one investigated because it's the same S-protein in all of the other products. The difference is just the delivery system. Honestly, we should've flagged it within the first 1-2 months when Astra Zeneca's adenovirus-based vaccine was causing clots all over Europe. FDA rejected their NDA here in the US over it, so they knew something was wrong. They just had no interest in learning "what something".
The problem is that this may not be the full story.
Some lots are worse than others. In fact only a small number of them, 1-2% of both Pfizer and Moderna account for >95% of all AE reports to VAERS. Most of those vaccines were fine and probably reflected the data we were getting from the companies, but 1-2% of the lots were ferocious. CDC collected the data. No one did the most basic analysis. It was FDA's job. Literally, FDA is required by law to inspect and certify those lots, and to monitor their side effects. It's very common for them to recall lots of various drugs because of contaminants. But they missed these. Or were they not looking? Some guy in Britain was looking. But the FDA wasn't? Something not on the ingredient list was going on and no one checked.
Very interesting information, thanks. I'm an engineer, so I'll be the first to admit this is outside my wheelhouse. But if I understand what you are saying, the SARS-COV2 is probably the underlying cause of the clots, and something in the vaccine (the S-protein) triggers an immune response that initiates extensive clot formation.
I still wonder if the deadly lots were sprinkled out to cause fear and increase the rate of vaccination (blame it on covid) , if they were "experimental" in the sense that different lots had a slightly different cocktail to find the most deadly, or if they were simply intended to start the depopulation process. I don't believe they were accidental. Yes, the possibility exists, but if the virus was not accidental (and there's plenty of evidence to support that it wasn't in spite of the government and MSM efforts to hide the information), then nothing about the vaccines are accidental either.
Is it possible the small number of bad lots actually points to something else?
Perhaps a similar small number of bad actors in a few select locations created fake VAERS entries for those specific lot numbers. Or some similar explanation that is not what everyone seems to automatically assume. Think about it...
That’s good! I’m hoping everything comes out! I have family that got the vax. (Just like many others here & around the world.) Thankfully one of my friends isn’t getting the boosters.
What about J&J & Moderna? Are they releasing ingredients? Are the ingredients the same? I’m not understanding why one company is releasing ingredients and the other companies aren’t.
I think Moderna is the worst of a bad lot. J&J tried to avoid the mRNA vaccines, but that was quickly shutdown due to blood clot issues. I think they all had blood clot issues, but blaming it on J&J was convenient.
Not letting J&J off the hook. I suspect their turn is coming. Unless we find out that the DS was swapping vaccines to create a narrative - I would not rule that out.
I've got a theory that the blood clots are the result of the S-protein's action itself when it binds the ACE2 receptor. We haven't fully characterized that interaction. Given that so much of that occurs on the vascular endothelium, the inner-most cells lining your arteries and veins, it's logic that there's at least a possibility that something's happening that's making blood clots more likely.
What exactly? I don't know. I've heard thoughts that inflammation is part of the story, a bit like how atherosclerosis works. But we don't know.
What we do know is that microclots have been observed in people with active SARS-COV2 infection and in people who've been recently vaccinated. We know that people who are at little to no risk of clots are showing them.
It warranted more investigation than it got.
Blaming J&J's product was a bit of a farce. I'll admit I missed it early. What about J&J's product was the problem? The adenovirus? We had extensive data showing it did not cause such things. The inactive components, the buffers, etc? Again, we knew they didn't cause such things. It had to be the S-protein product. But no one asked questions. Just slap the warning on the box and go forward. So they did.
No one investigated because it's the same S-protein in all of the other products. The difference is just the delivery system. Honestly, we should've flagged it within the first 1-2 months when Astra Zeneca's adenovirus-based vaccine was causing clots all over Europe. FDA rejected their NDA here in the US over it, so they knew something was wrong. They just had no interest in learning "what something".
The problem is that this may not be the full story.
Some lots are worse than others. In fact only a small number of them, 1-2% of both Pfizer and Moderna account for >95% of all AE reports to VAERS. Most of those vaccines were fine and probably reflected the data we were getting from the companies, but 1-2% of the lots were ferocious. CDC collected the data. No one did the most basic analysis. It was FDA's job. Literally, FDA is required by law to inspect and certify those lots, and to monitor their side effects. It's very common for them to recall lots of various drugs because of contaminants. But they missed these. Or were they not looking? Some guy in Britain was looking. But the FDA wasn't? Something not on the ingredient list was going on and no one checked.
Very interesting information, thanks. I'm an engineer, so I'll be the first to admit this is outside my wheelhouse. But if I understand what you are saying, the SARS-COV2 is probably the underlying cause of the clots, and something in the vaccine (the S-protein) triggers an immune response that initiates extensive clot formation.
I still wonder if the deadly lots were sprinkled out to cause fear and increase the rate of vaccination (blame it on covid) , if they were "experimental" in the sense that different lots had a slightly different cocktail to find the most deadly, or if they were simply intended to start the depopulation process. I don't believe they were accidental. Yes, the possibility exists, but if the virus was not accidental (and there's plenty of evidence to support that it wasn't in spite of the government and MSM efforts to hide the information), then nothing about the vaccines are accidental either.
Is it possible the small number of bad lots actually points to something else?
Perhaps a similar small number of bad actors in a few select locations created fake VAERS entries for those specific lot numbers. Or some similar explanation that is not what everyone seems to automatically assume. Think about it...
That’s good! I’m hoping everything comes out! I have family that got the vax. (Just like many others here & around the world.) Thankfully one of my friends isn’t getting the boosters.
Remember when they said that if you got the original J&J vaccine, that you were not considered vaccinated? What did they really mean by that?
I don’t know, I’ve read so much it all runs together. Is that the saline? Or is it because it’s not stopping Covid & introducing other diseases?