israel for last.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
This is insane Those 80's TV prophets were always talking about Gog and Magog and Russia being dragged into war with Israel. Why would Israel publicize such a provocative action? I had come to believe the Apocalyse was about revealing the truth. I still do, but this is weird - or more likely fake news.
We know the freemasons/cabal families altered the Bible for their agenda hundreds of years ago along with pope's Constantine and meddling priests so it is best to take everything written with a who benefits from this attitude
The only way for one to claim the Bible has been altered is if one has possession of the original (unaltered version) in order to compare the two and claim the text has, indeed, been altered.
Because of the sheer numbers (thousands) of manuscripts and copies and ancient quotes of the Biblical text, it is practically impossible for a change to be made without someone knowing. And these thousands of manuscripts allow us to work back to what the original said within a 99.9% accuracy. None of the variants that remain touch any major doctrines.
As you say it would be impossible for a change to be made without someone knowing ...and lots of people do know. For a start bigliano who was commisdione by the Vatican to clean up the Bible..itscina curacies etc and after toiling for I think 1 years the Vatican sacked him because it wasn't what they wanted to know...didn't fit their agenda
The Russian team working on 1000 year discrepancy also would confirm that many changes were made to fit various agendas....
Sorry this is obviously what you don't wish to know as it is common knowledge but people with an agenda don't look for truth only that the agenda remains undisputed
Way to try and stack the deck in your favor. You completely over look the 50,000+ manuscripts and fragments that exist, and are scattered all over the globe at different museums. From your responses to my comments, it is apparent that you have no experience with how manuscript evidence works. That's okay, maybe you will do some real research rather than relying on your conspiracy website to tell you how ancient texts are preserved.
Oh, and one more thing. Appealing to "common knowledge" is a really weak way to support your claims. Common knowledge is commonly wrong. Try another way...