💥⚖️💥 Justice Clarence Thomas Asks the Supreme Court to Reevaluate Big Tech’s Immunity Under Section 230 💥⚖️💥
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
LET'S GOOoOo
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Publisher or platform. You can't be both. That would go a long way towards solving this problem.
All it takes is for people to nut up and sue (if they have a valid case).
@Jack's chief legal officer went on Joe Rogan and expressly said that they're not a platform. He kept pushing her... ~"Aren't you really a publisher? Aren't these posts things that Twitter is saying?" And she was like "Yes, absolutely. We're not a neutral publisher. We try to do out best curating content, but we definitely aren't perfect at what we publish." Naturally, it all went through Rogan's ears without computing.
Facebook and Twitter HATE Section 230, and they're clear about it. They sent that "whistleblower" to go testify to congress. They want it repealed, because it EXPOSES them to liability... it doesn't actually protect them.
However, there's a huge turf campaign say the opposite... and that's convinced a few people that repealing 230 - which is literally what FB is openly campaigning for - would somehow hurt them.
A journalist who was banned on Twitter because of his covid reporting, is suing them. Alex Berenson is the reporter.