💥⚖️💥 Justice Clarence Thomas Asks the Supreme Court to Reevaluate Big Tech’s Immunity Under Section 230 💥⚖️💥
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
LET'S GOOoOo
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Publisher or platform. You can't be both. That would go a long way towards solving this problem.
Spot on.
Yes, but until these monopolies are shattered there will be no solution or freedom. The DS controls everything now. Not just tech and media, but banks and the massive holding companies that own the other mega-corporations that run everything else. Oh, yeah, and the politicians.
The one good thing I suppose that could come of this is that the smaller platforms could have their protections fortified. But even that matters little while the beast controls most of the information, and thus the population.
45 years ago the Government wouldn't even allow Bell South a monopoly on phone lines. Now look at the corruption and collusion. Way out of control.
Schrodinger’s Liability
All it takes is for people to nut up and sue (if they have a valid case).
@Jack's chief legal officer went on Joe Rogan and expressly said that they're not a platform. He kept pushing her... ~"Aren't you really a publisher? Aren't these posts things that Twitter is saying?" And she was like "Yes, absolutely. We're not a neutral publisher. We try to do out best curating content, but we definitely aren't perfect at what we publish." Naturally, it all went through Rogan's ears without computing.
Facebook and Twitter HATE Section 230, and they're clear about it. They sent that "whistleblower" to go testify to congress. They want it repealed, because it EXPOSES them to liability... it doesn't actually protect them.
However, there's a huge turf campaign say the opposite... and that's convinced a few people that repealing 230 - which is literally what FB is openly campaigning for - would somehow hurt them.
A journalist who was banned on Twitter because of his covid reporting, is suing them. Alex Berenson is the reporter.
Further reexamination and clarification would help sue. Or, on the other hand, prove that what they're doing is wrong so it can die slowly.
Very much so.
Unfortunately, I don’t think this will go anywhere, there is too much lobbying power on the Big Tech camp ($$) and far too many politicians on the take.