I’ve promised the mods I wasn’t going to sit here and debunk proofs all day.
I am not going to violate my respect for them in your desperate attempt to measure dicks in a conversation we’ve had over and over just because you haven’t agreed with my answers. I don’t live to serve you.
“Can you point to the source I stole my analysis of the primer report on?”
“Here’s a link to a search engine that probably has it somewhere but I won’t look.”
And,
“The MSM didn’t carry the story of Trump’s visit to the Forbidden City.”
“Yes, they did. Five seconds shows multiple MSM stories covering it.”
“We’ll, they didn’t cover the signficance.”
“Here is the entire first paragraph from CNN stating the significance.”
“You’re a sheep.”
Being wrong doesn’t even slow you down. Does it even register? Are you able to admit when a point you made has been defeated?
I can and have. But you? The possibility that you’re wrong doesn’t even make it past your ears.
I address Q posts specifically on occasion, as I did yesterday. I just chose the first proof presented.
I’ve already told you I’m not turning this account into a debunking account to debate prophecies when future proves past and Q might be talking in non-linear time and disinformation is necessary.
That makes arguing specific interpretations of Q posts a waste of time. Interpretations have changed and will continue to change as time marches forward.
I’ve explained why. I do not respect you more than the mods here. And losing respect for you does not mean I lose respect for this movement.
I’ve promised the mods I wasn’t going to sit here and debunk proofs all day.
I am not going to violate my respect for them in your desperate attempt to measure dicks in a conversation we’ve had over and over just because you haven’t agreed with my answers. I don’t live to serve you.
Ha.
I guess your research into this topic didn’t extend to yesterday.
You’re incredible.
“You’ve never analyzed a real Q proof.”
“I did yesterday.”
“We’ll, you didn’t do this specific one.”
And,
“You don’t do your own research.”
“Can you point to the source I stole my analysis of the primer report on?”
“Here’s a link to a search engine that probably has it somewhere but I won’t look.”
And,
“The MSM didn’t carry the story of Trump’s visit to the Forbidden City.”
“Yes, they did. Five seconds shows multiple MSM stories covering it.”
“We’ll, they didn’t cover the signficance.”
“Here is the entire first paragraph from CNN stating the significance.”
“You’re a sheep.”
Being wrong doesn’t even slow you down. Does it even register? Are you able to admit when a point you made has been defeated?
I can and have. But you? The possibility that you’re wrong doesn’t even make it past your ears.
I address Q posts specifically on occasion, as I did yesterday. I just chose the first proof presented.
I’ve already told you I’m not turning this account into a debunking account to debate prophecies when future proves past and Q might be talking in non-linear time and disinformation is necessary.
That makes arguing specific interpretations of Q posts a waste of time. Interpretations have changed and will continue to change as time marches forward.
I’ve explained why. I do not respect you more than the mods here. And losing respect for you does not mean I lose respect for this movement.
It just means losing respect for you.