He didn’t say Sussman duped them into spying on Trump.
Sussman is claiming his lie, that he was not representing any clients, is immaterial and Durham’s case against him should be dismissed.
Durham’s response is that Sussman’s lie could have changed the course of the investigation, and he has testimony from witnesses who will confirm this is true.
None of this implies anything else about anyone else who also was a part of this criminality.
He didn’t say Sussman duped them into spying on Trump.
Sussman is claiming his lie, that he was not representing any clients, is immaterial and Durham’s case against him should be dismissed.
Durham’s response is that Sussman’s lie could have changed the course of the investigation, and he has testimony from witnesses who will confirm this is true.
None of this implies anything else about anyone else who also was a part of this criminality.
You’ve given no coherent reason why this is “white wash”.
I’m not disappointed at all. Sussman’s lie IS material, and Durham can prove it. The case will go forward.
WINNING
Now who will be next??? :-O
He gets paid by the word.