Thermobaric bombs.

The questions is not whether these are used, but by whom. The truth always is the first casualty of war. The plan of attack usually second.

What is interesting though is that Russia accuses Ukraine of employing MLRS weaponry.

https://www.deagel.com/Artillery%20Systems/TOS-1%20Buratino/a002564#001 1985 = Soviet era. meaning: Ukraine also has them. Maybe not to the latest RF specification, but none the less ... also check out what Ukro's have as a heritance of the soviet era. https://greatawakening.win/p/142B5jh4dP/the-mysterious-craft-that-slamme/c/

Combine this with the notion that they may have capability to:

1. develop a nuclear warhead by themselves.
2. use and improve on the missile systems they still have. (think Iran, North Korea)

That is why the first item on the strategic list was to destroy the integration capabilities of the ukro military. And that was achieved within the first 24 hours.

With missile and precision munitions, many sites outside of civilian areas are easy to take care of. Those within civilian areas are much more difficult. Think your rank and file skyscraper .... or a university lab ....

Damn, I read plans of UMC Erasmus in Rotterdam wanting to have a BSL-4 lab, instead of a BSL-3. Such facilities are not to the advantage of human progress, but rather designed to it's destruction.