That .93 is not mentioned anywhere, and the study is not linked either so as far as I am concerned, OP is purposefully misappropriating stats in an effort to push a narrative. This movement is not free of liars yet… unfortunately
How can someone know about adverse events, especially hard to miss ones like dying, when they aren't reported? Only by guessing from our sample, which is faulty if VAERS. There are some other data bases, e.g. DoD and CMS, but the DoD was caught editing themselves recently. So far, the best we can do is collect everything and piece it together.
.93 of people had adverse events. There's really not a big unreported adverse population left, right?
That .93 is not mentioned anywhere, and the study is not linked either so as far as I am concerned, OP is purposefully misappropriating stats in an effort to push a narrative. This movement is not free of liars yet… unfortunately
And yeah...Mutliple adverse events per individual I think as well.
Unfortunately, Pfizer is hiding the truth so reasonable guesses are going to be taken.
Well 93% is a not a reasonable guess, that’s why I am voicing my concern with OPs motives.
How can someone know about adverse events, especially hard to miss ones like dying, when they aren't reported? Only by guessing from our sample, which is faulty if VAERS. There are some other data bases, e.g. DoD and CMS, but the DoD was caught editing themselves recently. So far, the best we can do is collect everything and piece it together.