It's not a good look when people play the 'shill' card whenever someone disagrees with something they've posted. If you have an intelligent criticism of someone's comment then respond accordingly. If you're offended by a comment but don't have anything better to respond with other than naming calling then perhaps twitter is more appropriate for you.
BTW why would you put quote marks around something that you typed out? If you're quoting something then for goodness sake copy and paste it!
Oh look, more naming calling and dismissal 😆. Do you have an actual objective criticism of anything I've posted, or would you prefer to keep showing your immaturity?
I call it like I see it and I see a beta glowie shill.
Cringe... 😖
You said Truth Social is a waste of time
Taken out of context. I said "a waste of time if only 0.1% of the population can get on it anyway" - is this not true? I'll assume you're getting wound up about the inference that less than 0.1% of the population will end up on it which is fair enough I guess. I'm happy to admit I was wrong on that if we can get some stats that prove otherwise.
You made your account over 250 days ago and were a handshake up until just a few days ago. You didn’t have a single comment or post for seven months, then you magically hop on and start posting stuff around the time this Russia/Ukraine stuff pops off.
What's your point?
Your comments are a mix of pretending to be an anon and crying about what’s being posted.
As I said earlier, do you have an actual objective criticism of anything I've posted?
You’re a fucken shill and you’ve been called out for it by other anons on here as well. You can drop the intellectual superiority act, it’s not working for you.
It's not a good look when people play the 'shill' card whenever someone disagrees with something they've posted. If you have an intelligent criticism of someone's comment then respond accordingly. If you're offended by a comment but don't have anything better to respond with other than naming calling then perhaps twitter is more appropriate for you.
BTW why would you put quote marks around something that you typed out? If you're quoting something then for goodness sake copy and paste it!
Oh look, more naming calling and dismissal 😆. Do you have an actual objective criticism of anything I've posted, or would you prefer to keep showing your immaturity?
Cringe... 😖
Taken out of context. I said "a waste of time if only 0.1% of the population can get on it anyway" - is this not true? I'll assume you're getting wound up about the inference that less than 0.1% of the population will end up on it which is fair enough I guess. I'm happy to admit I was wrong on that if we can get some stats that prove otherwise.
What's your point?
As I said earlier, do you have an actual objective criticism of anything I've posted?
Classic 😂