This is the absolute most disgusting attempt to "right-fact" history that I've seen.
Yes. You had better goddamned believe US servicemen were tortured in Vietnam. But there were ones who weren't, and those were the ones who cooperated with the NVA to provide anti-US propaganda. The "evidence" presented by this article and the book it's trying to pimp are the testimony of one of those traitorous collaborators and the chief prison guard of the Hanoi Hilton.
It will also put the war we are fighting against the DS into context.
If you want to rip NO NAME for being a traitor, go ahead. He wouldn't be the first to serve in the military and then turncoat for 30 pieces of silver, and there's more than enough from his career in the Senate to curse him.
But don't try to diminish the patriotism and sacrifice the rest of the POWs made by promoting this commie BS revisionist history just to get at him.
This is the absolute most disgusting attempt to "right-fact" history that I've seen.
Yes. You had better goddamned believe US servicemen were tortured in Vietnam. But there were ones who weren't, and those were the ones who cooperated with the NVA to provide anti-US propaganda. The "evidence" presented by this article and the book it's trying to pimp are the testimony of one of those traitorous collaborators and the chief prison guard of the Hanoi Hilton.
Find a copy of this book and read it: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/19053159-honor-bound
It will also put the war we are fighting against the DS into context.
If you want to rip NO NAME for being a traitor, go ahead. He wouldn't be the first to serve in the military and then turncoat for 30 pieces of silver, and there's more than enough from his career in the Senate to curse him.
But don't try to diminish the patriotism and sacrifice the rest of the POWs made by promoting this commie BS revisionist history just to get at him.
This
Thank you for making this clear.