I've been thinking about this exact thing today. How come everyone's so quick to justify Putin being in the WEF but still being a good guy (which I still think he is since he went publicly against the NWO plan called for by the WEF) but no one gives Tulsi a chance 🧐
We're all just humans after all. Hell I would join the WEF too even as a good guy just to make sure I knew what they were up to.
Putin is not a good guy. He kills journalists and has no problems taking out anyone that gets in his way. It is the Russian way and their politics have always been very messy. He is not a globalist at heart but was willing to go along as long as Russia was left alone. Something recently set him off and I think there was some backstabbing that made him reconsider his role. But that fact alone does not suddenly make him some kind of great guy. He is a nationalist fascist that has held a tight grip on Russian politics for years. If the rumors are true that he has cancer, then he may possibly be trying to cement his name in the history books by going against the West. He could care less about the West or the rest of the world for that matter. His only concern is Russia. That is why Trump respects him and understands him - to a point. But don't turn your back on him.
Gabbard is bought and paid for and is a plant being positioned to siphon Democrat voters that have left the plantation but are not willing to go full on Republican. She could end up being a third party candidate. We shall see. She is a likely horse in the running for a future campaign depending on which way the wind is blowing. The globalists always throw several people out there and wait to see which ones will stick to the wall. Then, they start to support whoever looks promising. Gabbard supports gun control and other leftist platform positions. She is from Hawaii after all. The state has never been known for producing conservative candidates. Gabbard is a globalist - plain and simple. She will do as she is told and will turn on the people. It doesn't matter what the hell she is tweeting or what she says at CPAC. CPAC is BS anyway. When in doubt, review her statements in the last presidential campaign.
When are people going to stop listening to lying words and start paying attention to past performance? This is all one big carefully orchestrated shit show. We have to stop supporting people that are thrust upon us just because they suddenly start saying what people want to hear. We must start pulling people from among our own ranks.
Look up Gabbard's positions. She was in favor of the Green New Deal but withdrew her support because the legislation was too vague over nuclear waste. But, she is clear about wanting to move into renewable energy and off fossil fuels. In September 2017 she introduced the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act ("OFF Act"). Tulsi advocates for universal basic income and free college. She is in favor of paying for the college tuition by a tax on trading stocks and bonds. The NRA gave Gabbard an F-rating because she supports additional restrictions to gun ownership and would love nothing better than to take away most people's right to have firearms. She supports universal single payer health care. When addressing housing issues she speaks in the universal globalist language of public-private partnerships. So, even though Ms Tulsi has some views that differ from the mainstream of her party's talking points, at the core she still holds some really basic globalist views that fit well within the WEF Great Reset.
As far as Putin is concerned, I have family history in Russia and have contacts in both Ukraine and Russia. My opinions are based upon knowledge of the country and its history and not from some narrative pushed by either side. The world is not clearly defined into good guys and bad guys. It is not that simple. Being in agreement over one issue, like being against the NWO, does not suddenly negate all the rest of the crap in the trunk. Putin is no one to mess with. With a little research you can find out about all the journalists that he has had wacked over the years. The rest, you can do your own homework. I've done mine.
I was aware of (most) of what you just listed about Tulsi. But why does that make her a Satanist and not just a libtard we can disagree with? That was my main point.
I've been thinking about this exact thing today. How come everyone's so quick to justify Putin being in the WEF but still being a good guy (which I still think he is since he went publicly against the NWO plan called for by the WEF) but no one gives Tulsi a chance 🧐
We're all just humans after all. Hell I would join the WEF too even as a good guy just to make sure I knew what they were up to.
Putin is not a good guy. He kills journalists and has no problems taking out anyone that gets in his way. It is the Russian way and their politics have always been very messy. He is not a globalist at heart but was willing to go along as long as Russia was left alone. Something recently set him off and I think there was some backstabbing that made him reconsider his role. But that fact alone does not suddenly make him some kind of great guy. He is a nationalist fascist that has held a tight grip on Russian politics for years. If the rumors are true that he has cancer, then he may possibly be trying to cement his name in the history books by going against the West. He could care less about the West or the rest of the world for that matter. His only concern is Russia. That is why Trump respects him and understands him - to a point. But don't turn your back on him.
Gabbard is bought and paid for and is a plant being positioned to siphon Democrat voters that have left the plantation but are not willing to go full on Republican. She could end up being a third party candidate. We shall see. She is a likely horse in the running for a future campaign depending on which way the wind is blowing. The globalists always throw several people out there and wait to see which ones will stick to the wall. Then, they start to support whoever looks promising. Gabbard supports gun control and other leftist platform positions. She is from Hawaii after all. The state has never been known for producing conservative candidates. Gabbard is a globalist - plain and simple. She will do as she is told and will turn on the people. It doesn't matter what the hell she is tweeting or what she says at CPAC. CPAC is BS anyway. When in doubt, review her statements in the last presidential campaign.
When are people going to stop listening to lying words and start paying attention to past performance? This is all one big carefully orchestrated shit show. We have to stop supporting people that are thrust upon us just because they suddenly start saying what people want to hear. We must start pulling people from among our own ranks.
You know what I think YOU'RE a globalist. You havent provided any evidence at all. This is all opinionated conjecture.
Look up Gabbard's positions. She was in favor of the Green New Deal but withdrew her support because the legislation was too vague over nuclear waste. But, she is clear about wanting to move into renewable energy and off fossil fuels. In September 2017 she introduced the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act ("OFF Act"). Tulsi advocates for universal basic income and free college. She is in favor of paying for the college tuition by a tax on trading stocks and bonds. The NRA gave Gabbard an F-rating because she supports additional restrictions to gun ownership and would love nothing better than to take away most people's right to have firearms. She supports universal single payer health care. When addressing housing issues she speaks in the universal globalist language of public-private partnerships. So, even though Ms Tulsi has some views that differ from the mainstream of her party's talking points, at the core she still holds some really basic globalist views that fit well within the WEF Great Reset.
As far as Putin is concerned, I have family history in Russia and have contacts in both Ukraine and Russia. My opinions are based upon knowledge of the country and its history and not from some narrative pushed by either side. The world is not clearly defined into good guys and bad guys. It is not that simple. Being in agreement over one issue, like being against the NWO, does not suddenly negate all the rest of the crap in the trunk. Putin is no one to mess with. With a little research you can find out about all the journalists that he has had wacked over the years. The rest, you can do your own homework. I've done mine.
I was aware of (most) of what you just listed about Tulsi. But why does that make her a Satanist and not just a libtard we can disagree with? That was my main point.