Phil Waldron

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/exclusive-backed-don-berlin-paid-dossier-created-set-president-trump-sedition/

"Phil Waldron, a retired Army colonel and an influential voice in the movement to challenge the election, said Friday from a bar he owns outside Austin, Texas, that he had circulated the document — titled “Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 JAN” — among Trump’s allies and on Capitol Hill before the attack. Waldron said that he did not personally send the document to Meadows, but that it was possible someone on his team had passed it along to the former chief of staff."

This is what is know in journalism as a "buried lede."

"A lede is the introductory section in journalism and thus to bury the lede refers to hiding the most important and relevant pieces of a story within other distracting information. The spelling of lede is allegedly so as to not confuse it with lead (/led/) which referred to the strip of metal that would separate lines of type. Both spellings, however, can be found in instances of the phrase."

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/bury-the-lede-versus-lead

This gatewaypundit article is by Joe Hoft. A journalist's journalist. And he buries the lede...

The question becomes why... why does he not identify Waldron who is not only associated with Mike Lindell / Cyber Security Symposium August 2021 (see below), but with Catherine Engelbrecht / True The Vote (TTV) election trafficking monitoring operation as well.

"Circle back" to read the two links below about Engelbrecht and TTV after reading about Waldron and Lindell. Lindell has stated on his broadcast, Lindell TV, on https://frankspeech.com/shows/lindell-tv that Engelbrecht will be joining the frankspeech platform in the near future with her own broadcast program.

https://greatawakening.win/p/13zNAtwKLk/-its-happening-true-the-vote-is-/

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/08/24/exclusive-true-the-vote-conducting-massive-clandestine-voter-fraud-investigation/ (url indicates august but article is dated october... which is more consistent with above link

Continuing with Waldron background...

Phil Waldron led the team of cyber experts evaluating the PCAP data of the 2020 election hack, obtained by Mike Lindell from Brandon Howse who was given the data by Dennis Montgomery. Where and how Dennis Montgomery obtained the 34 terebytes of data that represents the election systems monitoring of over 3000 counties in the United States has not been explained.

Lindell never allowed access by anyone outside of the team lead by Waldron to the raw PCAP data, and has since turned the data over to the DHS as provided for under CISA regulations...

Shall we play a game?

Knock, knock.

Who's there?

CISA.

CISA who?

CISA NCSWIC.

CISA NCSWIC who?

https://www.cisa.gov/safecom/NCSWIC

https://www.cisa.gov/safecom/NCSWIC who?

CISA https://qagg.news/?q=nothing+can+stop+what+is+coming

and https://qagg.news/?q=CISA

Oh... that https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Cybersecurity%20Information%20Sharing%20Act%20of%202015.pdf

Why didn't you say so in the first place!

SEC. 104. AUTHORIZATIONS FOR PREVENTING, DETECTING, ANALYZING, AND MITIGATING CYBER SECURITY THREATS.

(a) AUTHORIZATION FOR MONITORING.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a private entity may, for cyber security purposes, monitor—

(A) an information system of such private entity;

(B) an information system of another non-Federal entity, upon the authorization and written consent of such other entity;

(C) an information system of a Federal entity, upon the authorization and written consent of an authorized representative of the Federal entity; and

(D) information that is stored on, processed by, or transiting an information system monitored by the private entity under this paragraph.

(3) USE OF CYBER THREAT INDICATORS AND DEFENSIVE MEASURES BY NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—Consistent with this title, a cyber threat indicator or defensive measure shared or received under this section may, for cyber security purposes—

(i) be used by a non-Federal entity to monitor or operate a defensive measure that is applied to—

(I) an information system of the non-Federal entity; or

(II) an information system of another non-Federal entity or a Federal entity upon the written consent of that other non-Federal entity or that Federal entity; and

(ii) be otherwise used, retained, and further shared by a non-Federal entity subject to-

(I) an otherwise lawful restriction placed by the sharing non-Federal entity or Federal entity on such cyber threat indicator or defensive measure; or

(II) an otherwise applicable provision of law.

(B) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to authorize the use of a cyber threat indicator or defensive measure other than as provided in this section.

(e) ANTITRUST EXEMPTION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in section 108(e), it shall not be considered a violation of any provision of antitrust laws for 2 or more private entities to exchange or provide a cyber threat indicator or defensive measure, or assistance relating to the prevention, investigation, or mitigation of a cybersecurity threat, for cybersecurity purposes under this title.

(2) APPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (1) shall apply only to information that is exchanged or assistance provided in order to assist with—

(A) facilitating the prevention, investigation, or mitigation of a cybersecurity threat to an information system or information that is stored on, processed by, or transiting an information system; or

(B) communicating or disclosing a cyber threat indicator to help prevent, investigate, or mitigate the effect of a cybersecurity threat to an information system or information that is stored on, processed by, or transiting an information system.

By not allowing access to the raw PCAP data at the August 2021 Cyber Symposium and providing outside parties access only to "extrapolated" data, and data that had been scrubbed by cyber experts and reviewed by lawyers to insure compliance with CISA, and (eventually) turning the data over to DHS per CISA (done at the time Lindell's legal team made public the first draft of the States A.G Complaint // yet to be signed by the A.G.s and submitted to the Supreme Court)... everything Dennis Montgomery did, Brandon Howse did, Mike Lindell did, Phil Waldron and cyber team did, complies with CISA, and in the famous words of James Comey, there is "no illegality" in how they handled the data.

NCSWIC

The opening video from Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium featuring Col. Phil Waldron.

https://rumble.com/vkze5h-mike-lindell-cyber-symposium-your-wake-up-call-col-phil-waldron.html

More rumble Phil Waldron...

https://rumble.com/search/video?q=phil%20waldron

i think you see now why the story is not really about Berlin and Meadows, but purposefully burying the lede (Waldron) is hiding a rock among stones...

Hoft is messaging someone... for some reason... (we don't know)

"Its https://qagg.news/?q=moves+and+countermoves "

https://youtu.be/F19juIeXSFE?t=21

More references:

https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Cybersecurity%20Information%20Sharing%20Act%20of%202015.pdf

https://uscode.house.gov/statutes/pl/115/278.pdf

u/trolltide u/MAGAdeburger