Are individuals inaccurate while aggregates are accurate?
I liked him more when he was Quelle.
Also love following these conversations though I find it better not to engage with zel, I leave that to the man with the patience of a saint. Not that I care about his mass-downvoting of post history, more about him reporting people to protect his world view.
I said it was potentially a photoshop. I rarely claim absolute knowledge of anything.
The last time I tried to source that was in 2009, so I’m glad something came up in the meantime. You provided the source.
I analyzed it. Which is what you do when provided the source. I found it to be lacking, asked you to explain why you found the evidence to he convincing despite its objective problems, and received no clarification.
The mere fact that a source exists is step 1 in verifying a source. Please don’t get pissy that successfully fulfilling step 1 of demonstrating the validity of your claim is not enough to convince me of it’s credibility after I proceed to step 2.
As I said earlier, I enjoy watching you two have conversations, so every now and then I like to pop in and see what you two are discussing.
Are individuals inaccurate while aggregates are accurate?
I liked him more when he was Quelle.
Also love following these conversations though I find it better not to engage with zel, I leave that to the man with the patience of a saint. Not that I care about his mass-downvoting of post history, more about him reporting people to protect his world view.
Ding, ding, ding. Exactly. Zei will literally chase all your comments in your history like it's his goddamn job. It's sad, but fun to play with.
I said it was potentially a photoshop. I rarely claim absolute knowledge of anything.
The last time I tried to source that was in 2009, so I’m glad something came up in the meantime. You provided the source.
I analyzed it. Which is what you do when provided the source. I found it to be lacking, asked you to explain why you found the evidence to he convincing despite its objective problems, and received no clarification.
The mere fact that a source exists is step 1 in verifying a source. Please don’t get pissy that successfully fulfilling step 1 of demonstrating the validity of your claim is not enough to convince me of it’s credibility after I proceed to step 2.