Things getting wild - Peter Daszak (of Wuhan Funding infamy) is a son of an alleged Ukrainian Nazi collaborator !
(pete843.substack.com)
Langley AGAIN
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
You build a case by proving actual crimes, not doing family trees. What you seem to want to do, and what I object to, is to indict someone's reputation based on something someone else did... and in this case, it's not even clear what the someone else did. According to OP's article, Daszak's father was Conscripted, aka, FORCED to join the army. But that doesnt matter, because if you pin the term Nazi on him, well.. he must be scum o' the earth, right?
I think it's dishonest.
You build a case by looking at evidence. You can't get to evidence if you don't think a little nugget is worth your time. And this is more than a little nugget... This is a big connection between all of these people. It was shown to us through Q posts before they pulled back. {We should really go through all those Merkel/Nazi posts again as they're increasingly meaningful}
I understand what you're saying but it is relevant.
If you are saying that Daszak might be involved in developing biological weapons in Ukraine, and then deploying those weapons, yes, that is worth looking into. That is action, surely criminal. If you are saying that those biolabs are funded illicitly by Ukrainian corrupt people in collusion with American corrupt people, then that is money changing hands, actual action, and possibly criminal. Also worth looking into.
Connections don't mean squat unless it's in the furtherance of a criminal enterprise.
Yes of course