One of us won't live long enough.

9/11 -- The official account is good enough for me. You get to disprove it. Hard to do. The Twin Towers did a pancake collapse exactly as one would expect. I don't know much about building 7 but there must be an official explanation for that one, too. Not much difficulty in accepting that its structure could have been energized by the seismic signature of the Twin Towers collapse, hitting a resonant frequency. Or, if there is no good explanation, just accept that and move on. The absence of a good explanation does not validate any old explanation.

Saddam had chemical weapons --- which you confirm. Since any statement of past tense includes the idea that it happened "at one time," your objection is pettifogging. Not much of a point, since the big concern was that he had nuclear weapons, which was patently improbable.

HAARP -- has no mechanism to interface with weather, or the power to do anything. It is just a method of "ringing the bell" of the ionosphere. The ionosphere is barely like the interior of a cathode tube.

Cloud seeding, if you want to do that, is old, old hat and has nothing to do with contrails. (I learned about it on "You Asked For It" in the 1950s.) It takes concentrated localized effort. So what? You have a long, long, long jump between that and commercially pervasive contrails. What kills me is that the "chemtrail" sniffers are all worked up over nothing---and totally bypass the real chemical discharges occurring: fuel dumps from aircraft and solid-propellant exhaust plumes from space launches (hydrochloric acid). I grew up in a town when summer inversion layers would blanket the town in excess sulfur trioxide from the local paper mill. It makes sulfuric acid when it reacts with the moistur in your lungs. Not much fun to breathe it. And the chemtrailers moan about "blocking of the sun." They are so obtuse, it is frightening.

No rude awakenings in prospect. I will not be surprised if Sasquatsch is finally identified or at least verified. (My family has good grounds to think that they saw one at a distance in good lighting conditions.) I will be fucking amazed if a practical nuclear fusion process is perfected; it has been a long slog to the present, with no pot of gold showing up. But I will not be surprised if it turns out to be "cold fusion" of some sort. NASA will not perfect a reactionless drive (because they are NASA)---but the Chinese seem to have it in their hands. If SpaceX doesn't get to the Moon before NASA, I will be surprised. Stay tuned.