Could someone please explain to me why the (completely corrupt and Fake News king of all newspapers) New York Times finally admitting that the Hunter Biden laptop stuff if legit/real SUDDENLY makes it "true" in the public's eye??
FAR more credible sources - such as Bobalinsky (Hunter's business partner who confirmed the emails with his OWN name on them) and Rudy Guiliani who has all the files - confirmed this whole thing is legit ages ago.
It actually pisses me off that so much 'credit' is being attributed to this insanely corrupt "newspaper", which has sat on massive evidence of a bunch of crimes many times already that we know about, for God's sake.
Could someone please explain to me why the (completely corrupt and Fake News king of all newspapers) New York Times finally admitting that the Hunter Biden laptop stuff if legit/real SUDDENLY makes it "true" in the public's eye??
FAR more credible sources - such as Bobalinsky (Hunter's business partner who confirmed the emails with his OWN name on them) and Rudy Guiliani who has all the files - confirmed this whole thing is legit ages ago.
It actually pisses me off that so much 'credit' is being attributed to this insanely corrupt "newspaper", which has sat on massive evidence of a bunch of crimes many times already that we know about, for God's sake.