Funny how my original research/comment gets downvoted, as if someone really want to promote a fake story and made us look crazy and unprofessional.
I understand people voting for an article, just because of the subject (hopium), but if they have detailed instructions in the comment how to verify it themselves - how they can downvote? They're either shills or hopeless MSM fans. A message to this last group: "Sorry, I cannot play this google search on your TV."
It's not easy to interpret downdoots. People do a downdoot for different reasons.
For example, your comment started out with "Fake" which is a pretty strong assertion. People who thought it is genuine may well downvote because they want to demote a wrong statement.
I looked at TSAOW's reply, and concluded it was genuine. But revisiting the topic, I have to say, inconclusive and probably faked (partially - all good disinfo/fakery involves mixing truth with fiction).
On the other hand, TSAOW's reply also contained easily viewable links. Your comment was more of a primer on HOW to research.
But I think your conclusion "either shills or hopeless MSM fans" is way too extreme, and actually not helpful. Yes, we have some shills, but the board is also home to a wide variety of pedes at all different levels of the Great Awakening experience. Solidarity is important, imo.
Funny how my original research/comment gets downvoted, as if someone really want to promote a fake story and made us look crazy and unprofessional.
I understand people voting for an article, just because of the subject (hopium), but if they have detailed instructions in the comment how to verify it themselves - how they can downvote? They're either shills or hopeless MSM fans. A message to this last group: "Sorry, I cannot play this google search on your TV."
It's not easy to interpret downdoots. People do a downdoot for different reasons.
For example, your comment started out with "Fake" which is a pretty strong assertion. People who thought it is genuine may well downvote because they want to demote a wrong statement.
I looked at TSAOW's reply, and concluded it was genuine. But revisiting the topic, I have to say, inconclusive and probably faked (partially - all good disinfo/fakery involves mixing truth with fiction).
On the other hand, TSAOW's reply also contained easily viewable links. Your comment was more of a primer on HOW to research.
But I think your conclusion "either shills or hopeless MSM fans" is way too extreme, and actually not helpful. Yes, we have some shills, but the board is also home to a wide variety of pedes at all different levels of the Great Awakening experience. Solidarity is important, imo.