I don't think MTG is corrupt but ultimately, end of the day she has a career to protect, in a system that you simply cannot be a true renegade - at least not yet. And she has gone much further than other nominally 'patriot' R's in exposing congressional shittiness.
Don't get me wrong, fren...I am a fan of MTG. She is out there saying out loud what a lot of us have been screaming into the ear of a tone deaf Republican establishment. There are a lot of positive things that MTG has done for America, so credit where it is due.
I concede that there may perhaps be more going on the background that we are privy to, requiring her to stand with the narrative for now.
That's why I love GAW, it's the best forum I've ever found aligned with my way of thinking. We can agree and disagree, debate and use dialectic.
With MTG, one of the main things I'm impressed with is that she's gone public about how bills were being passed in congress with a minimal number of senators present, without them being read, and taking a verbal 'yay' or 'nay' count. She's been in there since insisting that bills get read in full and that the votes are recorded. So whatever her intentions are, at least she's done that for due process' sake.
That's a very balanced counterpoint. Cheers 🙂
I don't think MTG is corrupt but ultimately, end of the day she has a career to protect, in a system that you simply cannot be a true renegade - at least not yet. And she has gone much further than other nominally 'patriot' R's in exposing congressional shittiness.
Thank you!
Don't get me wrong, fren...I am a fan of MTG. She is out there saying out loud what a lot of us have been screaming into the ear of a tone deaf Republican establishment. There are a lot of positive things that MTG has done for America, so credit where it is due.
I concede that there may perhaps be more going on the background that we are privy to, requiring her to stand with the narrative for now.
We'll see how this all plays out.
I agree man! I find that rational discussion and debate is great fuel for gaining better and more well-rounded knowledge.
That's why I love GAW, it's the best forum I've ever found aligned with my way of thinking. We can agree and disagree, debate and use dialectic.
With MTG, one of the main things I'm impressed with is that she's gone public about how bills were being passed in congress with a minimal number of senators present, without them being read, and taking a verbal 'yay' or 'nay' count. She's been in there since insisting that bills get read in full and that the votes are recorded. So whatever her intentions are, at least she's done that for due process' sake.