I don't understand why this particular aspect of the DS is not being exposed. What better trigger than a leaked single video that cannot be dismissed as a deep fake? Followed by more and more leaks of prominent DS faggots. The longer that shit takes for idiotic normies to see, the easier for the DS to bring on some faceless "experts" to dismiss it entirely as deep fakes. So what are they waiting for?
Normies are stupid. I still see hoards of them wearing masks and masking their toddlers. These people aren't going to just stop being retarded. They need something like a shovel to the face.
At this point it makes zero sense to me why we haven't seen one clear tape of any one of them doing some horrific shit.
Anthony Podesta?
What about Anthony Wiener? I remember the shit on his laptop allegedly made hardened NYC detectives puke.
Ok so where is all that shit?
Don't go auto DoOoMInG either. It's a legitimate inquiry
Keep in mind that Q has to maintain "Plausible Deniability".
If this effort isn't an organic Grass-roots endeavor, some smart-ass deep pocket attorney could claim the NSA fabricated all these videos and evidence to frame those that were indicted.
We need multiple collaborating witnesses in front of grand juries that also have "skin in the game".
The media has been crapping all over "QAnon" day and night for years; so any evidence presented by the NSA would never stand up in the court of public opinion.
This may also apply to military tribunals, especially those that may take place in the Hague or Nuremberg.
Good questions, and yes, normies are stooopid. But we are working to fix that.
Wait a minute....I thought this was a swift "no court" type thing lol. Where are all these legal issues coming from all of a sudden?
Nonsense.
Questions are not only welcomed, but encouraged.
It’s the only way to true understandings…
With that said, your questions are smelling funny. Not sure about your intentions. It’s how you frame them that’s raising flags.
Tread lightly
Hes been here a while hes actually pretty cool 👍🏻 I don’t think hes a shill
Yea? Like which one?
I think my Fren means that you have the answer to your own question; and seeks to distinguish the difference between asking questions to understand and challenging in the form of a question. There is, here among Frens, no issue with challenging the narrative. I suppose the only issue when a challenge is couched in the proverbial “Honest question.” Just say it. Thrown down the gauntlet.
It’s your interpretation that’s narrow.