Only Three Q posts Used "Promises Made. Promises Kept" And They Were All In March
(media.greatawakening.win)
Q-analysis!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (80)
sorted by:
Deltas can be viewed that way, yes, except that Q instructed us very specifically to use the deltas. The whole concept of it is brilliant, actually. Q tells us to look at specific people to post messages with deltas that have very specific content related to Q posts. They ask over and over "How many coincidences until it's impossible?". Yes, people can always see patterns in things, but the specific alignment with which the posts always seem to line up, and the fact that, if you've read Q's posts front to back, Q gave specific instructions on COMMS. It's true - even a handful of those coincidences can be written off, but there are too many specific and highly contextual instances.
The time traveling stuff I write off. Much of the crazy shit I write off. What I do not write off is Q's own words and what they have said and specifically instructed. Nobody here invented deltas. Deltas were instructed by Q, and then the correct usage of them was also confirmed by Q.
Erm...there’s all of like 7 social media accounts that actually matter and nearly 100% of the time they make a very random cryptic seeming post on social media, its time stamp in military time lines up contextually with its associated Q drop...you’re also discounting the fact that Q told us about Truth Social in 2017, and the fact that the Q account is on Truth, registered before anybody, and posts things that demonstrate somebody extremely well versed in Q posts on that account.
Sorry bud but your message reads a lot like somebody who hasn’t even read the Q posts. Did you just come from patriots.win like yesterday? You should take a read.
Go to qagg.news, sort the posts first to last, and just read them. They ask questions and you’re intended to answer them by doing research and asking the right questions back. You can view the consensus answers on the same site, there’s a button for it.
EDIT: lol...I just read through some comment history of yours...nah I don’t think you’re a doomer at all. You’re a clear and obvious shill. The only reason you’d ever be on a .win is because you either came from Reddit or got pissed off at people trying to trigger you on 4chan. You know you’re going to lose right? Now that you’re outed, unless you care to defend yourself, I REALLY recommend you read Q’s posts and responses. :) You’re in for a fuckening, bud. “Dont jump!” when things come to fruition! ;)
Does it make sense to you that I should earnestly make an attempt at an argument while simultaneously getting those arguments censored? Just look at how my previous replies were censored. How would you propose we have a lenghty discussion while half of it gets censored as it gets posted?
In that note, I might as well be wiping ice as it melts - it just keeps on melting and wiping it just means you'll need to wipe it more.
Lose what? An internet argument? Oh no! lol get a grip on reality. I mean, as soon as you're finished decoding comms based on timestamps and contextual interpretation - now with a bogus Q account propped up by TruthSocial' admins as an obvious publicity stunt for their website ("registered before anybody" lmao no shit)... wait nevermind, forget about that "grip on reality"... we don't need that where we're going.
I really don't mind the occasional hostility in here (being told I'm from Reddit, being told I'm a shill, saying "I'm outed", being told not to "jump" lmfao), overall this is still a very positive place conducive for great back-and-forth discussions and I'm thankful to the admins. It just gets bumpy when people are censored and for what? Fear of challenging some narrative? I just don't know. People were bringing valid points - questioning the sillyness of Deltas and etc. Will set that aside though. Let's keep decoding comms to our heart's content, forever and ever, happily ever after.
We're on the internet. Yes, you need to be able to take some harsh arguments and respond in turn if needed and especially if the other person is incorrect. Welcome to the internet. If you don't like it, go back to your safe space.
Furthermore, like I said, it's apparent you have never even read the Q posts. People aren't just randomly looking at timestamps like some kind of Nostradamus. Q gave very specific instructions about COMMS and deltas and timestamps and who to look at. You just don't get it because you didn't RTFM.