Scientists agree there is no way to determine who is a woman (USA Today) ππ
(media.greatawakening.win)
π€‘ Clown World π
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (93)
sorted by:
Like 'women's suffrage' and women's rights apparently.
A person is LEGALLY said to be divorced if having been married at any time, not 'single' after the divorce.
The same is true about sex. If M at birth, then LEGALLY you're still a Male even after a sex change.
All these judges pretending they don't get that are liars and cheats at law.
I see what youβre saying but is biological sex a legal distinction?
It's a biological distinction resulting in both legal and civil determinations. In order to do this, the law has to distinguish.
Typically, a female guard would search a prisoner sent to jail, which is segregated by sex. When sentenced, the sex determined, the subject is sent to the corresponding sex's correctional facility.
The reasons to distinguish are the subject-at-hand.
To deny distinction legally is the intended slide of the DS imho.
"Scientists" who can't see the biological distinction are a disgrace to science.