With the question lingering .... as this is one of the most remarkable words in the whole lawsuit: Why use it in connections to the names, indicating both humans as well as corporations?
Think about it ..... What could the meaning be of those names: HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, JIM COMEY, be in terms of fictious?
Are they really...... Clowns in America -agents with a alias-name?
Are names like that, in capitals alias-names?
other options I have not yet thought of.
Actually, This is fascinating to ponder. I am very much intrigued. As Q wrote in 3040: "Has POTUS made a statement/assertion that didn't end up being proven correct?"
With the question lingering .... as this is one of the most remarkable words in the whole lawsuit: Why use it in connections to the names, indicating both humans as well as corporations?
Think about it ..... What could the meaning be of those names: HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, JIM COMEY, be in terms of fictious?
Actually, This is fascinating to ponder. I am very much intrigued. As Q wrote in 3040: "Has POTUS made a statement/assertion that didn't end up being proven correct?"