Does that matter when the replacement is assuming the role of that person? This is geo-warfare. Doubles have existed for many many decades if not longer.

The "Role" of that person, and their status as a malleable entity, is the asset, not the person itself.

Whether or not a double assumes the role, has no standing on whether the person identifying as Clinton can be sued.

They're not openly telling us about the double, and a lawsuit of this magnitude has to work with normies.

Thus, any attack against "Clinton" simply means the neutralization of a malleable puppet aka "ammunition".