Well of course! But a person high in social intelligence and aware of advanced behavioral conditioning paradigms, if seeking to communicate ideas subconsciously, would undoubtedly do it in such a way that plausible deniability would lead us to believe its probably just confirmation bias.
This is Neurolingustic Programming 101. The CIA run Mainstream Media networks have been doing this to the public for ages, however always with negative intentions.
What better way to break people out of the matrix, than to continue using Neurolingustic hypnosis techniques, however this time with the intention of INCREASING their awareness of this false reality.
Very familiar with NLP, done a bunch of training, and personally, I did not detect any content that suggests he's using NLP to prep the people. The straight forward interpretation is perfectly satisfactory and far more sensible/logical from my perspective.
I really like and assign a lot of value to the devolution theory. Why? Because it's logical, sensible, and most importantly, it doesn't over-reach. And, it's absolutely grounded in empirical evidence.
But all the nonsense about Biden not Biden, Clinton not Clinton, Fred not Fred. There's almost no empirical evidence, and what exists is highly debatable. It's speculative masquerading as factual, and it's not even sensible.
What would be
a) the legal justification for replacing a head of state or any other person for that matter with a double, day in, day out, for months and years?
b) how would you justify this to the public? "It's OK. We deceive you, just like the deep state did, but we did it for your own good. Because we're the good guys."
c) what logical or reasonable purpose does it serve to replace someone in a public position with a double day in, day out?
Real Raw News level of information.
And, its as if a lot of people simply haven't had any experience with a person advancing in their later years to a decline.
In my view, there is PLENTY of red-pilling going on through what is happening, and this sort of secret, oh, "Joe isn't actually Joe, and Tucker Carlson is now revealing it, but only hinting at it, to wake people up" stuff is just dumb. But that's my view.
Well of course! But a person high in social intelligence and aware of advanced behavioral conditioning paradigms, if seeking to communicate ideas subconsciously, would undoubtedly do it in such a way that plausible deniability would lead us to believe its probably just confirmation bias.
This is Neurolingustic Programming 101. The CIA run Mainstream Media networks have been doing this to the public for ages, however always with negative intentions.
What better way to break people out of the matrix, than to continue using Neurolingustic hypnosis techniques, however this time with the intention of INCREASING their awareness of this false reality.
I'm not sure you understand any of those words.
Well that's okay because I'm more than certain I do understand them.
Thank you. 👊🏼😁
Very familiar with NLP, done a bunch of training, and personally, I did not detect any content that suggests he's using NLP to prep the people. The straight forward interpretation is perfectly satisfactory and far more sensible/logical from my perspective.
I really like and assign a lot of value to the devolution theory. Why? Because it's logical, sensible, and most importantly, it doesn't over-reach. And, it's absolutely grounded in empirical evidence.
But all the nonsense about Biden not Biden, Clinton not Clinton, Fred not Fred. There's almost no empirical evidence, and what exists is highly debatable. It's speculative masquerading as factual, and it's not even sensible.
What would be
a) the legal justification for replacing a head of state or any other person for that matter with a double, day in, day out, for months and years?
b) how would you justify this to the public? "It's OK. We deceive you, just like the deep state did, but we did it for your own good. Because we're the good guys."
c) what logical or reasonable purpose does it serve to replace someone in a public position with a double day in, day out?
Real Raw News level of information.
And, its as if a lot of people simply haven't had any experience with a person advancing in their later years to a decline.
In my view, there is PLENTY of red-pilling going on through what is happening, and this sort of secret, oh, "Joe isn't actually Joe, and Tucker Carlson is now revealing it, but only hinting at it, to wake people up" stuff is just dumb. But that's my view.