He’s not technically correct on any point. Cattle contributes extremely, extremely little to “climate change”, even if you believe it’s a problem (it isn’t).
Property isn’t going away; you’ll just be renting it. That means it’ll still be “contributing” to “climate change”.
Children are starving due to government corruption. People like him taking the food and living large in Africa, etc. Seen it firsthand, spare me the moralizing.
This world could feed everyone if people would let it
Or just pop him. Like in Minecraft.
Or present an alternative solution.
He is technically correct. Or are your emotions foo cloudy to let you see that?
He’s not technically correct on any point. Cattle contributes extremely, extremely little to “climate change”, even if you believe it’s a problem (it isn’t). Property isn’t going away; you’ll just be renting it. That means it’ll still be “contributing” to “climate change”.
Nobody talking about climate change.
You didn’t even read OPs post, did you?
Just to be clear you think Klaus is correct? Really hoping I understood you wrong.
Children are starving due to government corruption. People like him taking the food and living large in Africa, etc. Seen it firsthand, spare me the moralizing.
This world could feed everyone if people would let it
What is technically correct about what he says?
What is an alternative solution that a dedicated Globalist/Marxist would accept or entertain?
You're asking me to try to give Charles Manson an acceptable alternative to Helter Skelter. It doesn't work that way with those types.
You must be new here 😂
Save the typo, he is correct in regards to unchecked population growth.
I imagine you folks think he was the guy in the photo on the beach.