“Pride” was the very first sin, committed by Lucifer himself.
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
At its core, this isn't the problem.
I think this is.
Sexual liberation is not for a child, at least not for one "guided" by their teachers in any form.
Our sexual interests are meant to come about naturally as we age and experience it.
Now, I guess, kids are engaging in shit so much earlier and I really think the fingers deserve to be primarily pointed at the media, teachers and politicians for pushing things under the guise of liberty and freedom when children are exclusively in the charge of their own parents and no one else.
The fact that if you speak up you get celebrities and media out the ass like Ron Perlman or Wanda Sykes or Mark Hamil slamming out "gay gay gay" which gets their fans on board with their agenda and shaming you instead of themselves is in itself destructive to our future.
I came across sex somewhat naturally as a kid. Through my own experiences. I did not need to be guided or groomed in any way, and I still turned out to be a degenerate. But at least my degeneracy existed in my own way, from my own experiences, and no kids are ever involved and will ever be involved.
It boils my blood that socially taboo labels are placed on the people protecting children.
I just don't understand the end goal. If you want to do what you want to do in your personal life, I have no issue with it. But trying to push it on kids at the age of 6?
Like you said, if anybody steps out against it, they're considered homophobic or transphobic, but nobody having these conversations with kids is considered pedophillic or grooming