Breast milk of jabbed woman, Dr. Carrie Madej: https://www.bitchute.com/video/al3TC2ZVTrac/
80% Inorganic
Toxicity Level was 8 of maximum of 10
Nutritional Level was 5 of a maximum of 10
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Organic when used to refer to label food products does not mean the same as organic when used in chemistry.
Inorganic is a chemistry term, and a food product would just be referred to as not being organic (unless it literally is entirely non-carbon-based).
Yes, I know. A person who has taken an mRNA "vax" is a genetically modified organism, a GMO, and thus while he or she is still a carbon-based lifeform ("organic" in the scientific sense of the term), he or she is ALSO "non-organic" in the most common use of the term today (and to the USDA, of course).
Ok, if we’re using USDA classifications for humans and human-based foods, we can probably agree that something can be either organic (unmodified) or not organic (modified).
What do you think the dr/scientist/woman in this video means when she refers to milk as being just 80% inorganic.
I’m betting it’s the 80% H2O content, but I’d love to hear your thoughts.
I don't know and neither does Dr. Madej (the woman speaking, I assume); she asks "What does that mean?" right in her presentation.
My guess is that, assuming it's not something someone made up, is that roughly 80% of the DNA has been modified in some way and to some extent, leaving only about 20% of the DNA in the milk to be natural and unmodified.
But without more detail than provided in the video, I'm skeptical.