That's not what they're saying. They're saying, "There are no doubt some isolated incidents, but if it really was that major, we'd know about it. There would be so many victims talking about it and surely, the media, while biased, isn't corrupt enough to hide something of that magnitude." They do not believe children are being mass raped over decades by powerful people and approve of this. The dam hasn't broken yet.
In fact, I’d go further and say that we even believe that there are criminal rings that traffic children, that Epstein was a part of one, and that these rings are a more serious problem than most people want to admit.
Those things are not hard to believe at all, and I don’t think you’d find most people disagreeing.
That's not what they're saying. They're saying, "There are no doubt some isolated incidents, but if it really was that major, we'd know about it. There would be so many victims talking about it and surely, the media, while biased, isn't corrupt enough to hide something of that magnitude." They do not believe children are being mass raped over decades by powerful people and approve of this. The dam hasn't broken yet.
I agree.
In fact, I’d go further and say that we even believe that there are criminal rings that traffic children, that Epstein was a part of one, and that these rings are a more serious problem than most people want to admit.
Those things are not hard to believe at all, and I don’t think you’d find most people disagreeing.
Correct, their interpretation is even more mundane and middling than OP suggests. Which is still inexcusable logic.