You need to be more careful when reading things like this, all your numbers and percents are wrong. First off, the top of the image says it's an analysis of post-authorization adverse event reports. So this is only breaking down the specifics of cases that were reported as 'adverse events', which can mean any number of things from light to serious. It specifically is ONLY looking at cases where someone reported that something went wrong, NOT the entire number of people jabbed.
Second, the top of the table itself says (N=42086). That means there were 42,086 adverse cases reported total, among everyone in the reporting period who got the shot. Out of that 42k, only 274 cases involved 270 pregnant women. This doesn't mean that only 270 pregnant women got the shot. It means that out of the much larger number of pregnant women that got the shot, 270 of them had 'adverse events' reported. And then out of those 270, a certain number were serious and some were not or not specified what even happened.
The image posted here doesn't give enough info to know the correct denominator, but it's not 75/270. Far more than 270 pregnant people took the vaccine. It's 75/some big number, which makes the % much smaller than you're saying.
Sadly, these kind of things (spontaneous abortion, stillbirth) happen A LOT MORE THAN YOU THINK even in completely normal pregnancies, so when you're tracking hundreds of thousands to millions of shots being given over a period of months, you are bound to overlap with some of those cases.
Either way posting a topic heading wailing 30% is one of two things: 1) lying to make things look worse than they are, which is bad and gives fodder for attacks, or 2) not understanding what you're reading and blowing things out of proportion, which makes us all look silly.
I wonder how many of those babies that survived would have been killed by the mother's spike-protein milk?
I know of an office where 3 vaxxed women got pregnant and 2 of the 3 babies already died before birth.
Waiting to see what the 3rd baby may have as challenges when born.
You need to be more careful when reading things like this, all your numbers and percents are wrong. First off, the top of the image says it's an analysis of post-authorization adverse event reports. So this is only breaking down the specifics of cases that were reported as 'adverse events', which can mean any number of things from light to serious. It specifically is ONLY looking at cases where someone reported that something went wrong, NOT the entire number of people jabbed.
Second, the top of the table itself says (N=42086). That means there were 42,086 adverse cases reported total, among everyone in the reporting period who got the shot. Out of that 42k, only 274 cases involved 270 pregnant women. This doesn't mean that only 270 pregnant women got the shot. It means that out of the much larger number of pregnant women that got the shot, 270 of them had 'adverse events' reported. And then out of those 270, a certain number were serious and some were not or not specified what even happened.
The image posted here doesn't give enough info to know the correct denominator, but it's not 75/270. Far more than 270 pregnant people took the vaccine. It's 75/some big number, which makes the % much smaller than you're saying.
Sadly, these kind of things (spontaneous abortion, stillbirth) happen A LOT MORE THAN YOU THINK even in completely normal pregnancies, so when you're tracking hundreds of thousands to millions of shots being given over a period of months, you are bound to overlap with some of those cases.
Either way posting a topic heading wailing 30% is one of two things: 1) lying to make things look worse than they are, which is bad and gives fodder for attacks, or 2) not understanding what you're reading and blowing things out of proportion, which makes us all look silly.
I got your point and constructive cirticism, can you point me out how to find what is the real total number in these described cases:
The full report would be the best place to start. This looks like a screenshot of part of one table in it.
More detail on this:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/horrifying-hidden-pfizer-data-show-unborn-babies-newborns-dying/
I suspect you mean "losing".
yep my keyboard needs changing, also the brain...
Just count the ones it reported. 42 outcomes are given - 25 of those are deaths. 25/42=59% dead. This is an atrocity.
It would also be useful to post expected numbers-- pre-scamdemic
losing, not loosing. Puh-leez!!
I'm a fan of fuck around and find out. I don't feel bad for those women.