From Praying Medic: " . . . The frantic rush to destroy society and usher in the Great Reset is evidence that they [Cabal] know they don't have much time. . . . They're racing against the clock. They [Cabal] know Trump is coming back. And with his return comes the storm that will destroy them."
(media.greatawakening.win)
N C S W I C
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (97)
sorted by:
Yeah Dave made that up, just like he makes up his ministry bullshit. Steinbart’s claim is simply that quantum computing allows for the transfer of information through time, both forward and back. This is demonstrably plausible by understanding how time dilation works. Do GPS satellites account for time dilation? Why? Are GPS satellites “time travelers” due to this? Saying the future doesn’t exist means you lack an understanding of time and quantum physics. What is religious prophecy? Are there anyone current day prophets? Is prophecy part of Dave’s online curriculum?
Q hints at time travel. Q hints at moloch/satan worship. Both of these are essential to unraveling the big picture. They are very much an essential component of this operation. By your standards, belief in Q is akin to belief in a CIA psyop. Credibility isn’t dependent on the subject matter- it’s dependent upon truth. Just because something appears crazy, that doesn’t invalidate it’s veracity.
A simulation, like a video game. The universe on a fundamental level behaves like a video game. Call it Gods video game if you want. The faster and further human technology progresses, the more likely it becomes that we are in a simulated universe. Think about today’s current level of simulated realities. Think about how advanced they will be in another 100 years. 1000 years? The simulations become indistinguishable from “reality.” The ability to think in abstracts is an indication of high intelligence. Nearly all current day advances in science are discovered using abstract concepts. My life is no less significant than yours, in the eyes of god. Where we go one, we go all ring a bell? Or does that only apply to people you agree with in full?
Steering clear of information that opposes your views is the best way to stay ignorant. For me, this is an exercise in the refinement of my arguments- none of which you’ve been able to refute. You resort to ad hominem and appeal to authority because the information I provide cannot be attacked. For you, this is about being right, not about learning.
And, since you have nothing to offer but bloviation, I will remain "ignorant," no thanks to you. i have paid attention, and all you do is make broad generalizations and speculations, and offer no insights whatsoever. You do nothing to alleviate "ignorance." It is all sophomoric b-s-ing. I got my fill of that in college. GPS satellites are not time travelers---unless you want to say that we are all "time travelers" by virtue of aging. But that is laughably trivial, and a cheat on what "time traveling" is supposed to mean. Photons don't travel from the future into the present, nor do we sent them from the present into the past. Too many internal contradictions. (A great article by Gregory Benford---"The Tachyonic Anti-Telephone---debunked supposed reverse time travel by superluminal particles.)
I don't do "hints," so what you are doing is reading a Rorschach blot. There is no message in such a thing. I'm more interested in the tangible statements about current political situations.
I spent a 40-year career doing system analysis and design, so I am quite familiar with abstract concepts. I have three degrees in applied physics, so I don't have to prove anything to you about my learning ability.
I'm not steering clear of anything. You haven't offered any crumbs, so what is there to steer clear of? You don't have any "arguments," just a series of rhetorical questions and speculations (when they aren't truisms).
In the whole progression of this dialogue, I see you walking back certain immoderate claims and seeking to carve a hole where you can fit by making generalizations. All you can do is make reference to notions that one picks up by reading popular science publications. Not interesting. Sorry.