Earlier today I explored the theory of Musk and bin Salman potentially selling their combined shares of Twitter to DWAC/TMTG, which would give Trump full control with 14% ownership. https://greatawakening.win/p/15HIY0c1NE/how-dwactmtg-could-take-ownershi/

Since that post, I've connected some data points that suggest Trump is controlling Musk through bin Salman.

Let's refer back to this excerpt from Q post 140 from Nov 11, 2017:

Return to SA.

Strings cut (+++).

Puppets (+++) in shadows.

Each side of the triangle controls a certain subsect of power brokers.

Power brokers are also labeled as the puppets/servants.

After the Saudi purge in November 2017, Trump took control (or influence) of the Saudi side of the pyramid through bin Salman.

If Musk were a power broker controlled by any side of the pyramid, it would be the wealthiest side worth $4 trillion, which, being a totalitarian state, could easily conceal Musk's expenses from public and legal scrutiny. A massive volume of capital would've been required to fund the Clown startups for electric cars and experimental rockets, as well as propping up the founder as the "Richest man in the world," which should've been impossible to achieve through subsidized companies returning unimpressive profits.

There's also Musk's business relationship with Saudi Arabia going back at least five years (that we know of). According to Musk last month, he claims he and Saudi began their business relationship in early 2017, which would have been when Obama groomer bin Al-Waleed was still controlling the kingdom. Musk says the offer from Saudi was to take Tesla private using Saudi funds. This would have benefited the Clowns by concealing the books, the operations, and all internal Tesla IP. Musk claims it was bin Salman who contacted him with this offer, not Al-Waleed, but there's no way to be certain. Musk also claims the plan was derailed by an irrational SEC, but it's just as likely it was derailed by the Saudi purge in Nov 2017. Details of the Tesla privatization story can be found here: https://tinyurl.com/3phe6tyj

This considered, it's no coincidence Musk bought the largest stake in Twitter while the second largest stakeholder was bin Salman, whose share of 5% he seized from Al-Waleed in 2017.

You'll notice the media does not publicize bin Salman's ownership in Twitter, but it was confirmed in this article from 2018 when bin Salman met with Dorsey: https://tinyurl.com/yc3jtnvx

Based on this theory of who controls Musk, what can we project? Let's go behind the Bloomberg paywall to speculate:

Twitter is particularly vulnerable to outside pressure because unlike Google, Facebook, Amazon and Snap, the company’s founders don’t have special voting control over its future. The company has just recovered from activist pressure by Elliot Management that started in 2020 which led Dorsey, who was serving his second stint as CEO of Twitter, to set a succession plan.

Oh. That's interesting.

It’s unclear what Musk is planning with his stake. The filing with the SEC shows that the date of the event that triggered the disclosure was March 14.** The type of form used often indicates the investor isn’t seeking to acquire control of a company, or to influence who controls it.**

So if Elon does not intend to control Twitter or influence its censorship practices, what would he do with such a large ownership stake? Could he sell it to an acquisition company, like one named Digital World Acquisition Corp?

This doesn't mean they would keep it running on the same infrastructure and managed by the same Marxist goons, it means DWAC would own the Twitter brand and user accounts, which could be transitioned to new TS infrastructure where bots and spoofs would go to die.

This would fulfill the Q post 55: "Look to Twitter."

Post 55 - Nov 02, 2017 2:44:21 PM EDT

LOOK TO TWITTER:

Exactly this: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us......."

God bless.