I fully agree - I was making the point that morals have slipped so far in society that college educated people have to have a law telling them to NOT talk to 5 y/os about sexual things in kindergarten classes.
Upvoted! IMHO any sexual discussion in the presence of minors under 18 should be considered sexual grooming and harshly punished with prison and fines. We need no sex ed at all of any type in any elementary or high school. How do we know this would be OK? Because the species survived and thrived all the way up until the 20th century without any sex ed at all. Somehow, humans manage to figure out this basic function without having their childhood ripped away from them before they can tie their shoes.
(BTW side note, a better word choice might be "double" meanings, as duplicitous = deceitful :)
KEK - I love duplicitous meanings
That's why we need a law telling college educated "teachers" that they should not be talking about sex with FIVE YEAR OLDS...
I fully agree - I was making the point that morals have slipped so far in society that college educated people have to have a law telling them to NOT talk to 5 y/os about sexual things in kindergarten classes.
Upvoted! IMHO any sexual discussion in the presence of minors under 18 should be considered sexual grooming and harshly punished with prison and fines. We need no sex ed at all of any type in any elementary or high school. How do we know this would be OK? Because the species survived and thrived all the way up until the 20th century without any sex ed at all. Somehow, humans manage to figure out this basic function without having their childhood ripped away from them before they can tie their shoes.
(BTW side note, a better word choice might be "double" meanings, as duplicitous = deceitful :)
/wordnerd