I post what i want i dont need you tell me what to post

And right you are. It serves the interest of this interaction to point out, this was never at issue. I honor your right to post whatever you want. Your choice. A1 and that sort of thing.

a member posted about "doomers" and described what to look for and how to spot them and you seem just like he was explaining,

If you conclude such, feel free to do so, I care not. Yet, if this is dooming in your book, my goodness, do not read an actual "doomer"-post. It will kill you. There is a slight difference between "doomer" and "boomer". Perhaps superfluous of me to point out. But in the interest of closure, how is it dooming when I am questioning Hall Turner screaming wolf=dooming, the sky is falling?(rhetorical question).

I was in Vietnam from 1969-1973,.15 mnths.....Millitary intelligence

This piece of information may or may not be factual.

Really, MI? And this piece of information you offered, that may or may not be true, is offered in the pursuit of what, exactly?
Are you now seriously putting a label of trust on this Hall Turner as a source? Should I then take the fact, you are viewing and using him as a serious source, as confirmation that it conveys any shimmer of relevancy or trustworthiness on him? Or... how about turning that question around: what does it tell us about you when you take him this serious, while he is constantly running wild and crying wolf .... and wrong for it, Mr. Intelligence?

So i was fighting a war while you were still sucking on you mothers tits

Floating a balloon, Mr. Intelligence, based on your own bubble. You have no way of knowing this. However, if I had the choice back then, I would choose my mother's tits over an unjust dirty war waged for corporate profits. But I guess we all have the right to be a sucker, once.

And besides, apart from whether or not you have done actual fighting at all, which I cannot confirm or deny, how is that relevant to the question at hand? We are talking about the reliability of a source, not your waging an unjust war for corporate profits prowess, yes?

Example: A certain source told a former MI6 agent that a certain presidential candidate, and subsequent president of the USA-INC, had been in Moscow and had specifically spent the night in the same room as the previous president of the USA-INC, called Punking Hussein, and had engaged in a "golden shower" with prostitutes.

What was actual fact, and what was fictious? We all know how that story ended up being reshuffled and interjected into the I.C.-community. Of course with a high level of confidence ....(of course that confidence level related to the act of interjecting. [/cynical]).

I check things over I know what to look for

if you say so ....and so did ... eh .... Buzzfeed and FBI and 17 I.C.-agencies. They knew exactly what to look for.

and cross reference

Against what? If anything has been clear these last 7 years: Intelligence is a nice name disguising the echo-chamber and un-intelligence.

,so i dont need some punk to tell me where or who i should post from Again, this was not part of what I wrote, neither implicit or explicit, as it is about the qualities of Hall Turner as a source. Yet, you seem to take it personally for quite a particular reason, as I mentioned in an earlier post.

No one can be 100% sure no matter where you post from,..!

Agree, and between 99,9% and 0% is a world of confirmation and logic.