Governments don't have any power over the people, how can 500-600 politicians with couple thousand other officials exert dominance over tens of millions?
All they can do is trick you and hope that you comply. You always have the choice and the louder your voice the more they fear.
Technically you can say no. We aren't being captured and force injected.
Companies just say they have the right to fire you.
Businesses just say they have the right to refuse service to you.
That's the real problem. A form of discrimination.
read the EUA and PREP act. Informed Consent is required. Informed consent is voluntary. the legal right to refuse taking an experimental medical product is enshrined in law.
even the Supreme Court ruling that upheld the mandate for healthcare workers did not clarify whether the mandate applies to FDA licensed products or EUA "investigational" products. judging by Sotomayer's profound misinformation, it seems the Justices are too stupid to know the difference.
the only ruling that can be enforced is a requirement for healthcare workers to obtain a fully licensed vaccine. but even then, you have legal grounds to demand clarification of the definition of a "vaccine." the current "genetic therapy" was allowed to be re-branded as a "vaccine" for the sake of FDA fast track approval, not consistent with their own scientific protocols.
Based on that right, which is not something that even SHOULD be legalized at all, because of any of the freedom amendments to the constitution, see Roe v Wade, but that is the Land of the Free for you, means you have the right to try Ivermectine or HCQ + Zink, etc. or any other therapeutic, even though the Fautsji-gang do not agree.
Governments don't have any power over the people, how can 500-600 politicians with couple thousand other officials exert dominance over tens of millions?
All they can do is trick you and hope that you comply. You always have the choice and the louder your voice the more they fear.
I like this. Going to use it, should I need to.
You always had a choice...way before DT
Technically you can say no. We aren't being captured and force injected.
Companies just say they have the right to fire you. Businesses just say they have the right to refuse service to you. That's the real problem. A form of discrimination.
read the EUA and PREP act. Informed Consent is required. Informed consent is voluntary. the legal right to refuse taking an experimental medical product is enshrined in law.
even the Supreme Court ruling that upheld the mandate for healthcare workers did not clarify whether the mandate applies to FDA licensed products or EUA "investigational" products. judging by Sotomayer's profound misinformation, it seems the Justices are too stupid to know the difference.
the only ruling that can be enforced is a requirement for healthcare workers to obtain a fully licensed vaccine. but even then, you have legal grounds to demand clarification of the definition of a "vaccine." the current "genetic therapy" was allowed to be re-branded as a "vaccine" for the sake of FDA fast track approval, not consistent with their own scientific protocols.
Based on that right, which is not something that even SHOULD be legalized at all, because of any of the freedom amendments to the constitution, see Roe v Wade, but that is the Land of the Free for you, means you have the right to try Ivermectine or HCQ + Zink, etc. or any other therapeutic, even though the Fautsji-gang do not agree.