Yes his lodge brothers on the Isle of Mann showed him the future so he could prep
as a shill years in advance to gain confidence as part of Operation Stargate to get the Reptilian psyop rolling to bring in a new monarchy as 'super SPECIES'.
How's his Satanic symbol-flashing ex-wife doing these days?
Ickes is a long game player spitting little truths wrapped in a big lie.
So satan is not too far fetched for you but the reptilian species is way out there ? Sounds like you got this all figured out ?
If satan and the fallen angels (nephilim) wanted to be seen as shape shifting reptilians, im pretty sure thats what they would be seen as. Im also pretty certain that its within their capabilities to shape shift and portray any form of themselves to anyone, and different forms to different people. So basically if they wanted you to see them as flesh eating reptiles, thats how you would see them.
Interesting that the welsh flag has a dragon on it, and that prince charles' title is the prince of wales. What is even more interesting is that prince charles is a descendant of Count Dracula (you can look this up) - now we have 2 human blood thirsty species linked to the King in waiting - where there is smoke, as the saying goes.
More related weirdness - the alpha romeo logo is of a dragon eating a human being as well, and even the vatican has reptilian architecture, one of the halls being a giant snake head (the body in italy and the head in the vatican state iirc). The entrance's to the square mile of london (the separate country, much like the vatican) also has dragon statues on all entries to it. They really did put in a lot of effort here for an elaborate international hoax, spanning centuries.
Heck even the Annunaki could be portraying themselves as the nephilim adding another layer(s) of confusion, to this wildly confusing hidden history of Earth and homo sapiens.
There is a difference between a question, a guess, and an answer.
Neither guesses nor questions are answers.
You don't seem to have found the answers.
So maybe you're asking the wrong questions.
These questions of yours are even answered in the very texts you purport to use, by the way. One can't simply read such material willy nilly and get a firm grasp on the cosmology, let alone being led astray by a LARPing shill called Sitchin. This was settled in the anthropology field some time ago, but remains a popular secret because to learn the truth would take lots of hard work.
Re: 'Satan is not too far fetched for you"...
The christian satan? Which one? Sha'hai-tan? The prosecutorial adversary?
Lucifer? What makes you so sure I subscribe to any such anthropromorphic notion? I do understand why and how they vary.
Re: Assuming 'A' is true, then I'm pretty sure that anything following A can only be also assumed which is not the same as being 'pretty sure'. It's called "Begging the question. So assuming that angels are conscious beings that 'want to shape shift', one can extrapolate lots of things from that.
My parents saw a UFO once and they worked that into their cosmology as a demon. Didn't make it a demon, but I suppose if a demon wanted you to think it was a UFO......or a peanut butter sandwich....and so life becomes ridiculous paranoia with uncertainty as to what is a demon and what is a glass of water.
Great
But that isn't what the daemon was seen to be by those who subscribed to an early belief that included them. Positive forces as angelic, and negative forces as daemonic..........the forces weren't seen as entities per se, but forces embodied by entities. Subtle enough of difference to escape many if not most's notice, it actually is a huge difference in psychology. Literalism exists in every religion. And so does the esoteric. One knows both. One knows only itself.
Annunaki means 'bridge' loosely. "Look it up" and Sitchin intentionally misled with his Dogen tribe story because he was Cabal and guess what?
His purpose was to create the GodMan psyop for the elites so they could rules as Gods once again.
They count on literalists not being able to translate nor understand the esoteric symbolism involved to pull it off. Seems to be working.
Dragon- Drago - Draco- Pendragon
Kundalini Caduceus - Snake as knowledge in the Tree of Life
Regenerative life force, shedding its skin, and mouth to tail symbol of eternity
Myths are very elaborate. So elaborate, very few 'get it' with continuity.
And they are international as well.
But they aren't a hoax. They are symbolic literal stories that contain gems of deeper meaning as guides in life.
Like the Bridge alluded to, called Annunaki and mistranslated to divide.
Where is that confounded bridge? It isn't literal.
"The key to the treasure is found under the poet's tongue."
e: 'Satan is not too far fetched for you"... The christian satan? Which one? Sha'hai-tan? The prosecutorial adversary? Lucifer? What makes you so sure I subscribe to any such anthropromorphic notion? I do understand why and how they vary.
Part of your initial reply of: "How's his Satanic symbol-flashing ex-wife doing these days?" led me to the assumption that you subscribe to some sort anthropromorphic notion of this character.
The LARPing of sitchin has some very interesting characteristics, one of them being what is referred to scientists as 'Junk DNA' which is that 90% of human DNA is inactive, which is very interesting. Its almost as if a more advanced species created humans in their image using their DNA in a laboratory, however switched off the majority of the functions of that DNA. Further to this the missing link so often discussed, is not a small step from one species to the next, it is a number of steps missing from one species to the next, which lends more credibility to this story, that there was an event that took place that created this giant change in DNA. Then there is evidence of humans mining gold in the cradle of human kind in South Africa pre 100K BC: https://newsrescue.com/ancient-200000bc-human-metropolis-found-in-africa/
We have plenty of overlapping stories intentionally designed to create confusion, however due to the intricacies of these stories, and how they all link to each other in some esoteric way, and how effectively we have been manipulated by the 'powers that be' sometimes makes me think that this is not the first time that this has been done to a planet or species like ours, lending more weight to the THEORY that we might actually be being manipulated by a more advanced species.
When I use the word Satanic in a public forum, it is received in many ways.
Knowing it's perceived in many ways, one still has to be chosen.
'Satanic' is the one that most seem to agree to mean evil in association with the Christian notion of 'Satan'.
There may have been actual manipulations of genetic information in humans in the past. Controlled mating does that in itself.
DNA doesn't act or not act, it triggers chemicals to create conditions on systems that exist to act. There are inert genetic triggers that some geneticists say is proof of common ancestry. I get all that.
I also see the strangeness of Rh negative and positive blood types suggesting contact with another species in the past.
The 'bluebloods' kept their genepool pretty tight, so that difference would show in indicators in the future.
We're currently struggling with the idea that one race should rule over others as their superior when the criteria for 'superior' is merely racial genetic tags.
If aliens or 'advanced race' built the pyramids, they still would have to use technology that we puny 'humans' could understand. Once learning it, does that make puny humans 'advanced' or 'even'? If some species came along and improved on the idea, does that mean they get to move into the White House?
They why wasn't Tesla elected president of the world? Would that be a smart thing to do?
'Advanced' is a relative term that includes the concept of time.
Universal Truths are timeless, belong to no race or species or time frame.
Technology allows various plays upon these truths in different forms.
Some are 'superior' to others in some ways, and 'inferior' in others.
A computer that filled a room can fit on a chip now.
Does that make modern man 'superior' in a way that allows him to claim domination of inferior races?
Yes.
How unfortunate that the word 'domination' and 'dominion' are conflated with each other.
I've met bluebloods. I have bluebloods on both sides of my lines.
Many were nearly sub-human in their view of humanity as beneath them.
Yes his lodge brothers on the Isle of Mann showed him the future so he could prep as a shill years in advance to gain confidence as part of Operation Stargate to get the Reptilian psyop rolling to bring in a new monarchy as 'super SPECIES'.
How's his Satanic symbol-flashing ex-wife doing these days?
Ickes is a long game player spitting little truths wrapped in a big lie.
So satan is not too far fetched for you but the reptilian species is way out there ? Sounds like you got this all figured out ?
If satan and the fallen angels (nephilim) wanted to be seen as shape shifting reptilians, im pretty sure thats what they would be seen as. Im also pretty certain that its within their capabilities to shape shift and portray any form of themselves to anyone, and different forms to different people. So basically if they wanted you to see them as flesh eating reptiles, thats how you would see them.
Interesting that the welsh flag has a dragon on it, and that prince charles' title is the prince of wales. What is even more interesting is that prince charles is a descendant of Count Dracula (you can look this up) - now we have 2 human blood thirsty species linked to the King in waiting - where there is smoke, as the saying goes.
More related weirdness - the alpha romeo logo is of a dragon eating a human being as well, and even the vatican has reptilian architecture, one of the halls being a giant snake head (the body in italy and the head in the vatican state iirc). The entrance's to the square mile of london (the separate country, much like the vatican) also has dragon statues on all entries to it. They really did put in a lot of effort here for an elaborate international hoax, spanning centuries.
Heck even the Annunaki could be portraying themselves as the nephilim adding another layer(s) of confusion, to this wildly confusing hidden history of Earth and homo sapiens.
There is a difference between a question, a guess, and an answer. Neither guesses nor questions are answers. You don't seem to have found the answers. So maybe you're asking the wrong questions.
These questions of yours are even answered in the very texts you purport to use, by the way. One can't simply read such material willy nilly and get a firm grasp on the cosmology, let alone being led astray by a LARPing shill called Sitchin. This was settled in the anthropology field some time ago, but remains a popular secret because to learn the truth would take lots of hard work.
Re: 'Satan is not too far fetched for you"... The christian satan? Which one? Sha'hai-tan? The prosecutorial adversary? Lucifer? What makes you so sure I subscribe to any such anthropromorphic notion? I do understand why and how they vary.
Re: Assuming 'A' is true, then I'm pretty sure that anything following A can only be also assumed which is not the same as being 'pretty sure'. It's called "Begging the question. So assuming that angels are conscious beings that 'want to shape shift', one can extrapolate lots of things from that. My parents saw a UFO once and they worked that into their cosmology as a demon. Didn't make it a demon, but I suppose if a demon wanted you to think it was a UFO......or a peanut butter sandwich....and so life becomes ridiculous paranoia with uncertainty as to what is a demon and what is a glass of water. Great But that isn't what the daemon was seen to be by those who subscribed to an early belief that included them. Positive forces as angelic, and negative forces as daemonic..........the forces weren't seen as entities per se, but forces embodied by entities. Subtle enough of difference to escape many if not most's notice, it actually is a huge difference in psychology. Literalism exists in every religion. And so does the esoteric. One knows both. One knows only itself.
Annunaki means 'bridge' loosely. "Look it up" and Sitchin intentionally misled with his Dogen tribe story because he was Cabal and guess what?
His purpose was to create the GodMan psyop for the elites so they could rules as Gods once again.
They count on literalists not being able to translate nor understand the esoteric symbolism involved to pull it off. Seems to be working.
Dragon- Drago - Draco- Pendragon Kundalini Caduceus - Snake as knowledge in the Tree of Life Regenerative life force, shedding its skin, and mouth to tail symbol of eternity
Myths are very elaborate. So elaborate, very few 'get it' with continuity. And they are international as well. But they aren't a hoax. They are symbolic literal stories that contain gems of deeper meaning as guides in life.
Like the Bridge alluded to, called Annunaki and mistranslated to divide.
Where is that confounded bridge? It isn't literal.
"The key to the treasure is found under the poet's tongue."
Thanks for your input
Part of your initial reply of: "How's his Satanic symbol-flashing ex-wife doing these days?" led me to the assumption that you subscribe to some sort anthropromorphic notion of this character.
The LARPing of sitchin has some very interesting characteristics, one of them being what is referred to scientists as 'Junk DNA' which is that 90% of human DNA is inactive, which is very interesting. Its almost as if a more advanced species created humans in their image using their DNA in a laboratory, however switched off the majority of the functions of that DNA. Further to this the missing link so often discussed, is not a small step from one species to the next, it is a number of steps missing from one species to the next, which lends more credibility to this story, that there was an event that took place that created this giant change in DNA. Then there is evidence of humans mining gold in the cradle of human kind in South Africa pre 100K BC: https://newsrescue.com/ancient-200000bc-human-metropolis-found-in-africa/
We have plenty of overlapping stories intentionally designed to create confusion, however due to the intricacies of these stories, and how they all link to each other in some esoteric way, and how effectively we have been manipulated by the 'powers that be' sometimes makes me think that this is not the first time that this has been done to a planet or species like ours, lending more weight to the THEORY that we might actually be being manipulated by a more advanced species.
When I use the word Satanic in a public forum, it is received in many ways. Knowing it's perceived in many ways, one still has to be chosen. 'Satanic' is the one that most seem to agree to mean evil in association with the Christian notion of 'Satan'.
There may have been actual manipulations of genetic information in humans in the past. Controlled mating does that in itself.
DNA doesn't act or not act, it triggers chemicals to create conditions on systems that exist to act. There are inert genetic triggers that some geneticists say is proof of common ancestry. I get all that.
I also see the strangeness of Rh negative and positive blood types suggesting contact with another species in the past.
The 'bluebloods' kept their genepool pretty tight, so that difference would show in indicators in the future.
We're currently struggling with the idea that one race should rule over others as their superior when the criteria for 'superior' is merely racial genetic tags.
If aliens or 'advanced race' built the pyramids, they still would have to use technology that we puny 'humans' could understand. Once learning it, does that make puny humans 'advanced' or 'even'? If some species came along and improved on the idea, does that mean they get to move into the White House?
They why wasn't Tesla elected president of the world? Would that be a smart thing to do?
'Advanced' is a relative term that includes the concept of time.
Universal Truths are timeless, belong to no race or species or time frame.
Technology allows various plays upon these truths in different forms.
Some are 'superior' to others in some ways, and 'inferior' in others.
A computer that filled a room can fit on a chip now.
Does that make modern man 'superior' in a way that allows him to claim domination of inferior races?
Yes.
How unfortunate that the word 'domination' and 'dominion' are conflated with each other.
I've met bluebloods. I have bluebloods on both sides of my lines.
Many were nearly sub-human in their view of humanity as beneath them.
I look down on them as they do others.
Luke 5:1-11
The Magnum Opus
The Great Working
The New World Order