Are you finding that if you discuss Devolution outside of GAW and Telegram, (message boards, mainly) the same folks who Literally Can't Even about Q are now keying in on Devolution talk with the same vehemence/inability to exhibit critical thinking?
The Newsweek article in Feb 2020 clearly states that the continuity of government plans are for nuclear strikes, or maybe COVID. Neither of those took out the gov't, so this Devolution fan fiction is dead in the water. (etc)
This Devolution nonsense is just the latest grift to snare the QTards. It's little wonder that they're duped by this PatelPatriot individual.
The directive is clear that devolution is to be made public. So devolution is again moot, null & void, failing to meet two mandatory triggers.
It's little wonder that the more vocal Q critics are going to target devolution talk, now. Poor Mike Rothchild is the leader of the Qbsessed blue checks, but they've failed to acknowledge that picking up what Q was laying down sets the mental stage for Devolution to make 100% sense.
Just curious what others' experience has been.
what might happen if Biden is taken offline with Covid ?
This is a great question, and I have to confess that I've never considered. Their entire line of Presidential Succession is illegitimate because their claim to lawful leadership is illegitimate.
PP did a great episode last week (Devolution Power Hour on Rumble) about the potential Constitutional crisis that might arise from a double vacancy in the WH, as well as questionable Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act of 1947