Just like many people instantly bought into Maxey’s claims about the 450 gb of new material he’s discovered on the laptop he got from Rudy G. , many people will also instantly buy into “there is no virus, 100,000 people across America entered into a massive conspiracy to poison us all with local water supplies”_
We’re in an INFORMATION WAR.
Psy-ops are being launched in your left and in your right.
Be careful who you follow.
GET RID OF ALL YOUR AUTHORITY FIGURES who appeal to your confirmation biases.
Research for yourself.
Don’t just instantly adopt some new claim some guy you never heard of two weeks ago presented to you.
The biggest danger MAGA has right now is that so many people have detached from reality they literally ready to believe anything.
You actually need MORE discernment and skepticism right now, not LESS.
Be your own authority.
(Brian Cates)
So there’s usually a variety of reasons that can cause evidence to be inadmissible. IMO the evidence that’s going to be released is probably really damaging so the attorney is going to throw a bunch of things at it and see if anything sticks. Few thoughts.
When the laptop was turned over to the FBI, it wasn’t submitted into evidence. That’s a problem right there. It’s like charging a drug dealer for 20 lbs of cocaine but there’s no cocaine.
Chain of custody- given to Rudy then Maxey. Technically, someone could alter the laptop
Character evidence which makes the person look bad and taints a jury
Evidence protected by privilege - Biden fam, national security, non disclosures, etc.
That’s a fight for the attorneys and a decision by the judge. It’s really about what’s presented and what can be argued. Can really only make an educated guess without seeing it all!
There are more than one copy, however.
If something new is found and can be corroborated on say, the FBI's copy (I know not likely), that could swing it.
Absolutely, which is probably the reason for giving it to multiple sources.
Altered laptop could be forensicly proven true or not.
No more like, a drug dealer gets busted with a bunch of cocaine (laptop). The police (FBI) log evidence into the system/evidence room. The dealers attorney says, it’s not cocaine it’s baby powder. They go to the evidence room, it’s not there bc the cop never entered it. No way to prove one way or another. The cocaine is inadmissible.
Like another anon said, there were multiple copies but if it wasn’t entered into evidence then there’s no way to say someone didn’t tamper with it (add pictures etc).
I recall a discussion around Q crumbs regarding how evidence is entered into an investigation, active around the time Giuliani's office was raided. Also we have Gaetz entering a HD copy into Congressional record, must count for something even if not forensic. Who else has been raided that had a copy of the thing at the time?
If I were a Jan6 detainee, I would subpoena the heck out of the original whistleblowing shop owner, to get one clean copy of that thing into trial evidence.
That would be something but if they’re not allowing the hours of videos from inside doubt they’d allow the laptop!