For starters, think logically. Elon Musk is HEAVILY opposed by the MSM, the left, deep state actors, WEF members, and the overwhelming majority of other billionaires. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The Deep State wouldn’t EO expend resources attacking Elon if Elon was under their control.
Logic aside, he’s proven it empirically many times. He sat down on an hour+ long interview with Babylon Bee and called CNN a bunch of perverts for their recent paedophilia scandals. He called wokeness “one of the greatest threats to modern civilization” while pounding a white claw. If that doesn’t tell you he’s on our side, Idk what to tell you.
He also zoomed in to the WSJ CEO Council meeting, trolled and mocked all the CEOs there and said the majority of positions at their companies are useless, calling them all greedy. Then proceeded to trash the globalist Build Back Better bill and said we need to stop government spending and end ALL government subsidies. He has publicly criticized Biden and the left-wing agenda on every front.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/07/tech/elon-musk-wsj-government/index.html
Left-wing media endlessly write hit pieces about him and are clearly vocally in opposition to Musk. Here’s NBC hinting at comparisons to Hitler and “right-wing”.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/think/amp/ncna1289377
Here is Vice attacking Elon back when he displayed C19 scepticism. Declaring “something extremely bogus is going on” after testing positive and negative for C19 at the same time.
Elon Musk has proven endlessly that he is on our side and is a direct enemy of the deep state and the left...
(BioClandestine)
As I understand it Musk bought majority share in Twitter stock. Vanguard turned around and bought the majority shares. Vanguard has much more money than Elon Musk, and will be able to our bid him every time, so there is essentially no chance twitter will ever leave the lefty side.
He bought about 9% A huge sum, but hardly a majority share
Sorry, I probably used wrong term. What I meant by majority share was that he became the largest share holder.
The story got twisted. He is the largest individual shareholder. But he has enough stock that they will listen. If he dumps it, their stock will go down. If he dumps, then there would be followers. It could be devastating. So he does have power.
True he has a lot of power over Twitter, I don’t doubt that.
It was a majority share. No other person or company owned a larger percent of shares.
Majority share means more than 50% https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/majorityshareholder.asp
Well, damn. Thanks.