Whilst you were distracted by Boris’s trip to Kyiv, the UK Gov. quietly published data confirming the Fully Vaccinated accounted for 92% of all Covid-19 Deaths in March
(dailyexpose.uk)
☠️ WE TRIED TO WARN YOU 💉
Official data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms the fully vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 92% of all Covid-19 deaths across England throughout March,but what’s even more shocking is that 82% of those deaths were among the triple vaccinated population.
But something even stranger than this is also occurring. Covid-19 is currently on the rise again across the UK, but the data confirms cases, hospitalisations and deaths are only rising among the triple vaccinated population, whereas they are declining significantly among the unvaccinated population.
I don’t wanna sound like a dick, but I will. If most of Britain is vaxed wouldnt that 92% be because almost all of Britain is vaxed. We can play with stats all day.
I’m not for the shot by no means, but making a big deal about numbers like this doesn’t seem to be a big deal.
If you look further down in the article they break it down in age groups of vax/unvax and put the rates as per 100,000 people in each group. Still much higher rates in the vaxed. Read the whole article. But you do make a good point.
I'm looking at table 14 on page 45. I see cases higher in vaxxed, but almost everything else (hospitalizations & deaths) the vaxxed are either a teensy bit better off (generally for people aged <50) or significantly better off (generally ages 50+) than unvaxxed. Personally, as someone under 50, I don't feel the improved outcomes is worth the risk, so I'm keeping my pureblood status. However, to make a big deal of this study as if the vax is causing population collapse.... well, that's not happening... yet.
And the number of cases is misleading, as the omitted footer of the table that was explains. People who are not vaccinated are also less likely to get tested when they have a sniffle so their rates are skewed very low. When things actually get bad, they show up at the hospital in higher numbers per capita.
These posts are almost always wrong because they cherry pick specific data and don't show you what you don't want to see.
Look, I think it is good to question wild assertions. However, even on the dodgy as fuck data that is available (which probably overstates clot-shot rates) https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations?country=GBR
If 92% of Covid related deaths are vaxxed, then that is a heavy over-representation for a population that is only 73% fully vaxxed.
Which seems like a big deal. Given that we were told endlessly the death shots were "safe and effective". Especially as it is going to take a wall of different data and influences to save any of the sheep from poisoning themselves any more. Maybe I'm missing something as to why you are dismissing evidence that seems to increasingly align with what sane voices like McCullough and Malone were saying all the way along.
What demographic tends to be the most vaccinated? The most at-risk: the elderly and those with serious health issues. The vax did not save them as promised, so they're the ones dying. However, the data would not (yet) suggest that the vax is causing people to die from COVID at a higher rate.
Well to a certain extent that assumption might hold water to a small degree. But I think getting vaxxed is more closely related to degree of brainwashing rather than health status. Pro sports people can hardly be described as the most at risk, young people can hardly be described as most at risk - yet they are all getting vaxxed. Obviously we have no data for that, but there is equally nothing to suggest that only chronically sick people are getting vaxxed (I might be slightly going to contradict myself for a second by saying that in NZ - our corrupt govt only counts people who have been in contact with their regional medical authority in the past 12 months in their %age counts of vaccination - and you could tenuously argue that you see the Dr more often then you could be ill, but you could also have regular sports injuries, or be preggers, or be hypochondriac etc). Interesting points and I agree we need to be sure of our data and avoid the wildly unprovable assertions that libtards live for. Still I think it's hard to see over representation of death with Covid among the vaxxed as not an indication of some causation. If it was say 90% vaxxed and 90.5% death rate among vaxxed - then sure - the argument is tenuous. But the disparity is much higher. Still - I do agree on the need to be cautious and not be hyperbolic.
The big deal is that the kill shot kills.
If it's an MSM news boy position to want to represent the facts accurately, then I guess I'm an MSM news boy. You do realize that pushing bogus data just ends up making us look stupid, right
You are correct. Even the chart they show later with rates per 100,000 has important footer information and columns removed. They show more reported cases among vaccinated individuals, who are more likely to get tested, and the missing columns show higher rates of hospitalization and death among the unvaxed.
This is yet another misrepresentation of data that makes us look stupid when we try to use it.
That's only "strange" if you don't think the vaxx is poison. I do.
That's not what the data says at all.